My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
8018
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
8018
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:32 PM
Creation date
6/1/2009 12:39:22 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
8018
Author
Irving, D. B. and B. D. Burdick.
Title
Reconnaissance Inventory and Prioritization of Existing and Potential Bottomlands in the Upper Colorado River Basin 1993-1994.
USFW Year
1995.
USFW - Doc Type
\
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
143
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Criterion B, (Green River): Proximity to a known or planned razorback sucker <br />spawning area <br />5 = within 1-25 river miles downstream of a spawning area <br />4 = within 26-50 river miles downstream of a spawning area <br />3 = within 51-75 river miles downstream of a spawning area <br />2 = more than 75 river miles downstream of a spawning area <br />1 = upstream of a spawning area <br />Criterion B2 (Colorado River): Proximity to recent adult razorback sucker <br />captures (using data from 1974-1993, [Burdick <br />1992; Quarterone 1993]) <br />5 = 100 captures <br />4 = 50-99 captures <br />3 = 15-49 captures <br />2 = 6-14 captures <br />1 = 0-5 captures <br />Criterion C: Having a June hydrological connection to the river <br />3 = yes <br />2 = unsure <br />1 = no <br />Criterion D: Potential for network (complex) of bottomland sites <br />5 = yes, z 8 sites <br />4 = yes, 6-7 sites <br />3 = yes, 4-5 sites <br />2 = yes, 2-3 sites <br />1 = no, only 1 site <br />Step 5: The sub-criteria raw scores were then multiplied by the total <br />average weighted point values to produce a total score for each bottomland <br />site. The total score was sorted from the lowest to the highest with the <br />highest total score receiving the lowest ordinal rank and lowest total score <br />the highest ordinal rank. The lowest ordinal rank was the top priority site <br />and the highest ordinal rank was the lowest priority site in the bottomland <br />inventory. The Green River drainage was scored and prioritized independently <br />from the Colorado and Gunnison river drainages. <br />Geomorphology <br />Three general geomorphological categories were used to simplify <br />bottomland classification and identify habitat types. These categories were <br />floodplain depression, floodplain terrace, or gravel-pit pond (Figure 2). <br />These three categories were the most numerous encountered in the inventory, <br />although there were other habitat types such as canyon mouths. <br />10
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.