My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7145 (2)
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
7145 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:29 PM
Creation date
6/1/2009 12:01:54 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
7145
Author
Inslee, T. D.
Title
Spawning of Razorback Suckers
USFW Year
1981.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
21
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
• ~~ l~r~ <br />Egg hatching in the six-foot circular tank that the water was 22 inches <br />deep proved less than satisfactory. There was not enough flow through the <br />rock bed, which resulted in a putrid area where eggs were incubating. <br />Another prot~lem in the first trial was the heavy growth of fungus that <br />probably further reduced the flow of water through the rocks. The lowering <br />of the water with a six inch standpipe helped to alleviate the problem. The <br />non-aeration of eggs was not encountered in the second trial with the lowered <br />i <br />standpipe.' The problem of fungus was still present. The hatching success of <br />viable eggs could not be measuzed due to the unknown total number of eggs. <br />Observations of and counts of viable versus non-viable eggs gave indications <br />that the hatching success of viable eggs in the second test was as high as <br />could be expected. The circular tank hatching is one method that is recom- <br />mended even though fungal growths will be hard to control. Another disad- <br />vantage is not being able to determine what is happening and the culturist <br />has very little control over the eggs while in the tank. <br />The tray suspended in a tank hatching attempt gave indications t~1at <br />this may be a method that could be utilized. Water exchange and aeration <br />was not what would be desired. I,~ater flows piled some of the eggs. Fungus <br />problems were encountered and will be difficult to control utilizing this <br />method. The percentage of viable eggs was low that was utilized in this <br />test. This technique needs further testing with air stones added to in- <br />crease aeration of water. <br />The hatching method that gave the best results was the Heath incubator. <br />The one drawback was the heavy fungal infestation that developed on the 3rd, <br />4th and 5th day. The fry go through the screen and can be removed from the <br />trays through the clean-out hole. Even though fungus may be controlled in <br />the future, the lar a percentage of bad eggs will cause problems of hatching <br />eggs regardless of the method used. The non-fertile eggs start to break down <br />~3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.