My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7143
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
7143
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:29 PM
Creation date
6/1/2009 12:01:48 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
7143
Author
Inskip, P. D.
Title
Habitat Suitability Index Models
USFW Year
1982.
USFW - Doc Type
Northern Pike.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
50
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Development of Suitability Index Graphs: Rationale and Assumptions <br />The preceding suitability index graphs should be regarded as tentative <br />and open to modification. The prospective user should understand that the <br />curves are not the products of extensive laboratory or field investigations. <br />Rather, they reflect the ,author's subjective integration of the literature, <br />personal experience, and reviewer comments. The following discussion documents <br />some of the thought process that went into constructing the curves. Some <br />curves are better documented than others. In many cases, there is information <br />about preferred and limiting or unsuitable conditions, but little information <br />on which to base ratings of intermediate conditions. No particular signif- <br />icance should be attributed to inflection points unless specifically noted in <br />the text. Straight line segments can be substituted for~the sigmoid portions <br />of the curves. The model is offered as a starting point, with the hope that <br />refinements will be made as additional information, including results of <br />testing the model, becomes available. <br />Ratio ofi spawning habitat to summer habitat (V1~. Spawning habitat avail- <br />ability is a logical .starting point in the development of a habitat suitability <br />index model for northern pike. High spring water levels can create spawning <br />habitat if they flood terrestrial and wetland vegetation. The amount of new <br />spawning habitat that results depends on shoreline topography and the amount <br />of adjacent vegetation. The relative availability of spawning habitat can be <br />estimated by the ratio between the amount of surface area in the spring that <br />is shallower than 1 m and vegetated and the entire surface area of the water <br />body in summer. <br />The minimum ratio, below which spawning habitat availability limits <br />population size, depends on the carrying capacity, or productivity, of summer <br />habitat. Other model variables account for factors which limit post-fry <br />stages. Therefore, the minimum ratio is estimated for the theoretical maximum <br />density of northern pike. Snow (1978) presented data suggesting a maximum <br />density of 40 pike greater than 35 cm in length per ha (20 kg/ha). Higher <br />densities could not be maintained even though food .was plentiful. This maximum <br />density value was used to develop the suitability index curve for spawning <br />habitat availability. <br />It is assumed that spawning habitat suitability is positively, but <br />asymptotically, related to the area of spawning habitat per spawning female. <br />This means that an increase in the amount of spawning habitat per female is <br />more beneficial when spawning habitat is relatively scarce than when it is <br />plentiful. Limited evidence in support of this assumption is available. <br />Female northern pike have typically been stocked in managed spawning marshes <br />at densities between 5.4 and 23.2/ha (1 fish per 1,847 m2 and 431 mZ, respec- <br />tively) (McCarraher 1957; Forney 1968; Royer 1971; Fago 1977). Increasing the <br />density of females from 11.4 to 22.4 fish/ha (5.9 to 17.6 kg/ha) only slightly <br />increased the yield of fingerlings from an experimental marsh in Saskatchewan <br />(Royer 1971). Maximum production from managed spawning marshes in Minnesota <br />was obtained at stocking rates of 11.2 kg of femaleslha (Jarvenpa 1962b). <br />21 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.