Laserfiche WebLink
effect of flows on backwater habitat availability and Colorado squawfish produ <br />reports, however, primarily address summer flows. Pucherelli and Clark (1989) <br />increase in backwater area in Island Park and below Split Mountain as peak flo <br />Backwater habitat was maximized, they reported, if flows were decreased gradua <br />between 1000 cfs and 1800 cfs at the Jensen gage. The system is obviously mor <br />this simple model would suggest. Summer and winter flows have a great impact <br />availability, particularly in the spring. Spring flows do scour and move sedi <br />primarily depositional. Lower flows later in the year sculpt the deposited ma <br />habitats available for YOY fish (J. Schmidt, pers. comm. The importance of <br />reestablish habitat should not be overlooked, however. Habitat availability a <br />tied to a serious of flow events over time. Pucherelli, Clark and Szabadou (1 <br />numbers of backwaters per river mile and backwater area per river mile are hig <br />year to year because of channel morphology and changes therein. Hlohowsky and <br />suggested that seasonally adjusted high flows would provide the most nursery h <br />therefore, potentially increase recruitment. They cautioned, however, that th <br />also increase overwinter mortality. They, further, reasoned that seasonally a <br />steady flows would benefit native fish the most and that year-round high fluct <br />most detrimental. <br />That no relationship could be detected between Colorado squawfish number <br />spring peak flows was not expected. Timing and success of spawn for all endem <br />fish have been tied to the natural spring hydrograph and associated water temp <br />1986). Beyond this, McRda and Keading (1989), Haines and Tyus (1990), Tyus an <br />