Laserfiche WebLink
describe a situation similar to that reported here. Haines and Tyus (1990) st <br />Green River backwaters were found most frequently in backwaters deeper than 0. <br />Colorado squawfish, in addition, used backwaters with surface area greater tha <br />later reported mean surface area for Colorado squawfish backwaters of 1158 m2, <br />269 m2 for unused backwaters (Tyus and Haines 1991). This mimics results of t <br />Colorado squawfish backwaters averaged 992 m2 and unused backwaters had mean s <br />of 404 m2. There were seasonal variations in the size of backwaters used by C <br />Backwaters used in the spring were deeper (0.44 m) and had greater surface are <br />those used in summer (0.31 m; 993 m2) and fall (0.3 m; 918 m2). This differen <br />of temperature differences between main channel and backwater habitats in the <br />discussed below) and temperature stability in large, deep backwaters during th <br />period. <br />Turbidity has also-been noted as a distinguishing characteristic for Col <br />use. Reports by Grabowski and Hiebert (1989) and Tyus and Haines (1991) point <br />Colorado squawfish use in more turbid waters. Although the three-category rat <br />study prevented numerical analysis of turbidity, contingency table analysis by <br />showed that Colorado squawfish were not distributed evenly across those three <br />Backwaters with Colorado squawfish were more likely to have higher turbidity r <br />unused backwaters. <br />Temperature and temperature fluctuation have also been implicated in Col <br />squawfish backwater preference. Tyus and Karp (1991) reported that Colorado s <br />most abundant in backwaters as warm as, or warmer, than the main channel. The <br />