Laserfiche WebLink
Table S. Contingency table statistics for comparison of distribution of backwa <br />for backwaters used by Colorado squawfish vs backwaters not used by C <br />squawfish in the Green River at Ouray NWR: 1990-1996. <br />POOLED <br />II BACKWATER TYPE <br />CS use <br /> <br />I <br />I HS IP LV MS SC SE <br />IIN OBS 115 13 3 1251 217 24 <br /> EXP 15.3 3.84 2.30 218. 252. 19.9 <br /> 6 87 66 7 <br /> DEV 0.36 0.84 0.69 32.1 35.6 4.03 <br /> 13 6 <br /> X2 0.00 0.18 0.21 4.71 5.03 0.81II <br /> 8 4 0 7 3 5 <br />IYE OBS 1 5 2 1 0 1 34 112 2 1 <br />IS , <br /> <br /> EXP 4.64 1.16 0.69 66.1 76.3 6.031 <br /> 3 4 <br /> DEV 0.36 0.84 0.69 32.1 35.6 4.03 <br />U 3 6 <br /> X2 0.02 0.60 0.69 15.6 16.6 2.69 <br />I 8 8 6 11 58 6 <br />X2 47.263 df = 5 X2 < 0.001 <br />FISHER'S EXACT 2TAILED PROBABILITY = <br />5.40E10 <br />SU1~Il~R <br />' <br />ICS use BACKWATER TYPE <br />II HS IP LV MS SC SE <br />N <br />I OBS 8 1 1 102 80 7 <br /> EXP 7.65 2.29 0.77 <br />1 93.3 <br />$ 89.5 <br />5 5.36 <br />I DEV 0.35 1.29 0.23 8.62 9.55 1.64 <br /> X2 0.01 <br />6 0.73 <br />2 0.07 <br />2 0.79 <br />6 1.01 <br />8 0.50 <br />3 <br />YE <br />S OBS 2 2 0 20 37 0 <br /> EXP 1 2.35 0.70 0.23 28.6 27.4 1.64 <br />