My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7970
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
7970
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:32 PM
Creation date
6/1/2009 12:00:57 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
7970
Author
Dowling, T. E. and W. L. Minckley.
Title
Genetic Diversity Of Razorback Sucker As Determined By Restriction Endonuclease Analysis Of Mitochondrial DNA.
USFW Year
1994.
USFW - Doc Type
Bureau of Reclamation, # 0-FC-40-09530-004,
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
60
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
(Templeton, 1990), or inbreeding may arise and further complicate the situation. <br />A second alternative lies in the use of cutoff bays in Lake Mohave as semi-natural <br />breeding sites. This requires removal of predators from isolated backwaters, stocking adults <br />to spawn unattended, and releasing both adults and their progeny back into the lake (Marsh <br />and Langhorst, 1988; Hinckley ~et al., 1991). Repetition of this procedure in several cutoff <br />bays over a number of years (using different adult individuals directly obtained from the lake <br />each year) will result in production of a diverse group of cohorts. Five, one-year pilot bays <br />used a total of 145 females between 1984 and 1992. Progeny of sizes large enough to escape <br />predation were produced and freed into the lake in two of those five years. If 10 such bays <br />were established and 40% successful (as above), approximately 120 different females could <br />contribute progeny each year. Continuation over a number of years would thus maintain far <br />more genetic variability than possible under most hatchery conditions, but again, space <br />availability (i.e., number of hays) limits the number of fish contributing each year. Another <br />disadvantage of this alternative is a lack of control over reproduction, making it impossible to <br />equalize contribution within and among bays or insure that all individuals actually reproduce. <br />A third option is the direct capture and short-term husbandry of wild-spawned larvae <br />from Lake Mohave, followed by their reintroduction into the reservoir. Larval razorback <br />suckers appear along shorelines of Lake Mohave in December-Ianuary and may persist to <br />April-May (rarely into Iune). They are positively phototactic and readily collected, manually <br />or by light traps (Marsh and Langhorst, 1988; Bozek et al., 1991; Mueller et al., in press). <br />Numbers captured vary with absolute number of larvae present, weather and lake conditions, <br />light sources, personnel, etc. Two dedicated collectors can nonetheless harvest hundreds to <br />thousands in a few favorable nights. There is evidence based on tag-recapture data that a <br />large proportion of the individuals in Lake Mohave reproduce each year (Marsh„1994), so <br />2b <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.