My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7970
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
7970
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:32 PM
Creation date
6/1/2009 12:00:57 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
7970
Author
Dowling, T. E. and W. L. Minckley.
Title
Genetic Diversity Of Razorback Sucker As Determined By Restriction Endonuclease Analysis Of Mitochondrial DNA.
USFW Year
1994.
USFW - Doc Type
Bureau of Reclamation, # 0-FC-40-09530-004,
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
60
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
There have also been concerns over the impact of hybridization among razorbacks and <br />other species of suckers, especially flannelmouths. Introgression among suckers has likely <br />always been a relatively common phenomenon, especially when sev~,ral species are sympatric <br />and one or more are rare (Hubbs et ai., 1942; Hubbs, 1955). Therefore, detection of low <br />levels of introgression between razorbacks and flannelmouths (like that observed in the Lake <br />Mohave sample) is not surprising. Concerns over hybridization between these species are not <br />unwarranted, but introgression does not yet seem to be of unusual magnitude. Samples from <br />the Little and upper Colorado River regions were taken from areas where razorbacks are <br />relatively uncommon, and the incidence of hybridization was apparently higher. Therefore, as <br />populations of native suckers decrease and/or exotic species become more abundant, the <br />impact of hybridization (especially involving introduced species) will likely become more <br />significant. At present, concerns over hybridization should focus on other species, especially <br />those introduced to the Colorado River system. For example, analysis of mtDNA from a <br />number of flannelmouths from the upper Colorado River has revealed considerable <br />introgression with white sucker, C. commersoni (Hutchison and Dowling, unpublished data). <br />Therefore, concerns over introgression should broaden, as introduced species (e.g., white <br />suckers, Utah suckers [C. ardenr], longnose suckers [C. catostomus]) are most likely to have <br />the greatest impact on dwindling populations of all native Colorado River species.- <br />CAPTIVE POPULATIOI\S <br />Goals of captive propagation.- Objectives for captive propagation of endangered species <br />contrast sharply with those for fishes more traditionally under cultwe. Sport and commercial <br />fishes maintained in hatcheries were typically common, of high demand, and had:'already been <br />15 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.