My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7956
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
7956
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:32 PM
Creation date
6/1/2009 12:00:29 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
7956
Author
Day, K. S.
Title
Colorado Squawfish Population Trends, Upper Green River And Lower White River, Utah, 1990-1994 (Draft).
USFW Year
1995.
USFW - Doc Type
\
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
34
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
.. <br />,~. ~ - . <br />Fourteen other species were caught during YOY squawfish monitoring (Table 6). <br />Two other species of native fish (Catostomus sp. and Gila sp.) were encountered (Table <br />7). Suckers were the most numerous native species caught in 1992 and 1994 and second <br />most numerous in 1993. Their numbers and CPUE varied in opposition to those of <br />squawfish (Figure 12). Gila sp. were second most numerous in 1990, 1991 and 1994, but <br />never numbered more than S I individuals caught. Variations in numbers and CPUE for <br />chubs mimicked that of squawfish (Figure 12). <br />Non-native fish were much more common than native fish in all years except <br />1991, when they were least prevalent of any reporting year (Table 7). Red Shiners were <br />the most numerous species, followed by fathead minnows. Sand shiner numbers were <br />highly variable, but greater than native fish in 1992 and 1994. Mean CPUE for non- <br />native fish varied even more than that for native fishes. Red shiner CPUE ranged from <br />2.69 fish/ 100 m2 in 1991 to 902 fish/ 100 m2 in 1994. Fathead CPUE ranged from 0.28 <br />fish/ 100 m2 in 1991 to 66 fish/ 100 m2 in 1994. Sand shiner captures surpassed fathead <br />only in 1994 (96 fish/100 m2). There was no relationship between variations in CPUE <br />for these fish and the native fishes (Figure 12}. <br />Although flows are thought to have the greatest impact on fish production in the <br />Green River, it is~clear from these five years data that other factors influence <br />production. For example, flow and run-off events were very similar in 1991 and 1994, <br />but squawfish numbers and growth were drastically different. Likewise, there was no <br />definitive relationship between mean CPUE for the five other fish species recorded and <br />flow conditions. <br />Considerable concern exists about the effect of non-natives (predation and <br />competition) on native fish production. If competition were a direct contributing factor <br />in determining growth and survival of native fishes, native fish and non-native fish <br />numbers should vary in opposition. The data presented do not indicate this. squawfish <br />and chub production appeared to vary in inverse to sand shiners, but this did not follow <br />for the 2 other non-native species sampled. In fact, the data seem to indicate a negative <br />relationship between sucker and squawfish numbers. <br />RECOMMENDATIONS <br />Continued monitoring is necessary to ascertain population status of Colorado <br />squawfish in the Green River. Increased catches of adult fish in 1994 could be an <br />indication of strong recruitment from the 1986 year class and the beginning of <br />recruitment from the high productivity year of 1988. Strong recruitment from these year <br />classes is important for future population growth. In addition, continued adult <br />monitoring will allow researchers to ascertain strength and survivorship of the 1991 year <br />class, the third most productive year since 1986. Lastly, it will be important to determine <br />28 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.