Laserfiche WebLink
backwater were searched only for squawfish, which were measured to length and <br />released. Numbers, and sometimes lengths, of all other native species and some <br />introduced species were also noted. <br />Physical measurements of all backwaters sampled were taken in an attempt to <br />determine squawfish habitat preferences. Physical measurements included surface area <br />(my), water depth (1/10 ft) along hauls and at the deepest point of the backwater, <br />substrate type and depth, and water temperature (°C). <br />Upon completion of data gathering at the -first 2 suitable backwaters in a 5-mile <br />subreach, the crew proceeded downstream to the next subreach. Sampling procedures <br />were repeated within this subreach as described. This process was repeated until 2 <br />backwaters had been sampled in each subreach, or the crew reached RM 215. <br />.. ~, <br />RESULTS AND DISCUSSION <br />Late-juvenile/Adult Monitoring-, <br />A total 205 late juvenile/adult Colorado squawfish were captured during <br />monitoring of standardized river reaches from 1990-1994 (Table 1). This-represents a~ <br />72% increase from the period 1986-1989 (Cranney 1990).. An additional 56 squawfish <br />were captured in 2 elective reaches sampled• in 1993 and 1994. Capture rates in 1990 <br />matched the low rates reported by Cranney for 1987 and 1988 (Figure 3). They <br />remained low through 1992 in 3 of 4 Reaches. Mean catch-per-unit effort (CPUE; <br />squawfish/hr) in Reach 2 increased 5-fold in 1991, however, and remained at that level <br />through 1993. Capture rates in Reaches 3 and 13 doubled between 1992 and 1993. <br />Overall squawfish captures increased dramatically in 1994. Reaches 1, 2 and 13 had the <br />highest CPUE since standardized monitoring began. Although CPUE for Reach 2 did <br />not surpass previous highs, the number of fish captured (12) was nearly equivalent to the ' <br />high years 1986-1988. The Elective Reach sampled in 1994 (RM 280 to RM 262) had <br />the highest CPUE (3.48 squawfish/hour) reported on the upper Green River since <br />standardized monitoring began in 1986. <br />The number of squawfish observed but not captured showed a corresponding <br />increase (Table 2). Ninety squawfish were observed but not netted, a third of these in <br />the White River. The ratio of fish observed to fish captured varied from 0.0 to 0.72 over <br />the reporting period. The averaged for the period was 0.34. Ratios were generally <br />highest in the White River and Ouray reaches, both between and over years. <br />7 <br />