My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
8028
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
8028
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:32 PM
Creation date
6/1/2009 12:00:15 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
8028
Author
Daly, S. F., et al.
Title
Effect Of Daily Fluctuations From Flaming Gorge Dam On Formation Of Ice Covers On The Green River -Draft.
USFW Year
1997.
USFW - Doc Type
\
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
124
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
1 <br />SUMMARY OF THE 1996-97 FIELD MEASUREMENTS <br />In order to allow comparison of ice conditions in the study reach under steady flows with <br />conditions after peaking flows, a controlled flow regime was implemented for Flaming Gorge <br />Dam. After ambient air temperatures, water temperatures, and weather conditons became <br />conducive to formation of ice cover (water temperatures near the freezing point for water and a <br />weather forecast of consistent sub-zero air temperatures) releases from Flaming Gorge Dam were <br />held steady fora 3-week period in order to allow ice cover to form within the steady reach. This <br />steady flow period was followed by a period of fluctuating flows. Afield team observed ice <br />conditions on the Green River before, during, and after the peaking period. During the three <br />weeks before the peaking period, Flaming Gorge Dam maintained a constant outflow of 1900 cfs, <br />resulting in a discharge of approximately 2440 cfs at the Jensen Gage, which is located <br />approximately 90 miles downstream of the dam. Arrangements were made to begin a diurnal <br />peaking cycle at 0700 hours on January 25, 1997, with a rang,P of 800 to 3,000 cfs. Goals were to <br />document ice conditions before and after the wave from the peaking cycle passed through the <br />study reach, and to record water and ice stage changes at cross-section locations as the wave <br />passed. <br />Two field teams spent January 23-24, 1997 measuring ice thickness and channel depth at <br />17 cross sections under the steady flows regime. These measurements were made by using a <br />hand-operated ice auger to create a 2.25-in hole in the ice cover and a tape measure with a hinged <br />weight to obtain the measurement of ice thickness following the procedures of White and Zufelt <br />(1994). The depth of each sample location was measured using a stadia rod inserted through the <br />hole in the ice. Measurements of ice thickness and channel depth were repeated at the same <br />cross-section locations on January 29-30, after the waves from several peaking cycles had passed <br />The locations of the cross sections are shown in Figure 15. The ice thickness was fairly uniform <br />along the channel, with measurements ranging from 0.6 to 0.8 ft, both before and after the <br />peaking period (Table 4 and Figure 16). Ice thickness and river depth data for the individual <br />points on cross sections are shown in Appendix A. In the lower region of the study reach, from <br />the Jensen Bridge to the Ouray Bridge, roughly half of the channel area was composed of <br />juxtaposed frazil pans and floes while the remaining area was thermally grown sheet ice. From <br />the Jensen Bridge to Razor Island the channel gradient was steeper, and the ice cover was <br />rougher, consisting primarily of juxtaposed frazil pans and floes. <br />In the event that stage fluctuations resulting from hydropower peaking caused release of <br />the ice cover, ice motion detectors were installed at three locations within the study reach. Each <br />detector consisted of a sensor unit and a wire circuit. The sensor unit, which contains an internal <br />clock to record the date and time was installed on the shoreline and the wire connected to the unit <br />was embedded into the ice cover. Any break in the wire, such as occurs when the ice cover <br />moves, caused the sensor to record the date and time when the circuit was broken. The first ice <br />motion detector was placed at RM 308.2 on January 25, 1997. A second ice motion detector was <br />installed upstream of the Bonanza Bridge at RM 290.4 on January 26, and a third was installed <br />within the Ouray Wildlife Refuge at RM 254.3 on January 30, 1997. <br />12 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />~J <br /> <br />~i <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.