My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
8028
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
8028
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:32 PM
Creation date
6/1/2009 12:00:15 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
8028
Author
Daly, S. F., et al.
Title
Effect Of Daily Fluctuations From Flaming Gorge Dam On Formation Of Ice Covers On The Green River -Draft.
USFW Year
1997.
USFW - Doc Type
\
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
124
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
1 <br />forms in the Green River study reach is composed largely of this frazil ice. The bridging location <br />at the downstream limit of the ice cover was consistently observed to be in the area of Ouray <br />Bridge or beyond. The stationary ice cover progressed upstream from this point during each <br />winter, consistently reaching between RM 302 and about RM 316. The ice observations are <br />summarized in Table 3. The extreme upstream limit of the stationary ice covers was at the Chew <br />Bridge (RM 316). This is the downstream end of a steep gradient reach and it is unlikely that <br />ice-cover would progress upstream of this point in most mild and moderate winters due to the <br />high flow velocity in the channel. It is interesting to note that the maximum upstream ice cover <br />extent on the Green River only varied by about 14 miles (RM 302-RM 31b) even though the <br />maximum AFDDs recorded (486.5-1333.0) during the winters varied widely. There are two <br />reasons for this. The first reason is that the ice cover consistently bridges at or near the Ouray <br />Bridge each winter (RM 248}. The second reason is that the ice cover can progress upstream <br />very quickly during periods of cold weather. The ice cover progresses upstream largely through <br />juxtaposition from the Ouray Bridge (RM 248) to the Bonanza Bridge (RM 290). Upstream of <br />Bonanza Bridge, the ice cover progresses largely through juxtaposition with some underturning <br />of the ice floes. The tendency of the floes to underturn increases as the ice cover progresses <br />further upstream from Bonanza Bridge because flow velocity and Froude number increase. <br />During the winter of 1987-88, layers of frazil ice were observed beneath the stationary ice <br />cover in the reach from RM 305 to RM 316. This is the only winter season when such frazil ice <br />deposits were observed. This was the coldest winter, as measured by the accumulated freezing <br />degree days, for which ice observation are available. It is likely that the intense cold of this <br />winter season resulted in tremendous amounts of frazil ice being produced upstream of the study <br />reach. The frazil ice was probably carried beneath the stationary ice cover which was prevented <br />from progressing upstream beyond the Chew Bridge due to the steep gradient of the river. This <br />frazil ice was deposited beneath the ice cover throughout the reach immediately downstream of <br />the leading edge of the cover, RM 305 to RM 316. Frazil ice layers beneath river ice have been <br />observed in many rivers throughout the world. <br />It is interesting to note that the daily release schedule of Flaming Gorge Dam does not <br />seem to have a very large influence on the overall pattern of ice formation in the study reach of <br />the Green River except for the maximum extent of the ice cover. Even this difference is <br />relatively small, and varied only between River Mile 302 and 316 (Table 3). It is important to <br />note that the maximum extent of the ice cover occurred during the winter of 1987-88, when it <br />was observed that the iee cover progressed upstream as far as Chew Bridge (RM 316). It was <br />also during this winter that exceptionally thick ice covers were observed in the reach from RM <br />305 to RM 316 due to frazil ice deposition beneath the cover. It is likely that the daily <br />fluctuating flows produced velocities capable of transporting the frazil ice produced upstream <br />beneath the ice cover in this reach. During winters when the flow was held steady, such as 1996- <br />97, the flow velocities were not great enough to cause frazil ice transport beneath the ice cover. <br />However, when the flows are held steady ice cover can only progress upstream as far as River <br />Mile 310.8. Apparently this is due to the fact that flow velocity is too high upstream of this <br />location to allow the ice cover to progress unless it is exceptionally strong. The deposition of <br />frazil ice beneath the ice cover causes the ice cover to be thicker and ultimately stronger. In <br />addition, the very thick ice covers formed through frazil deposition would tend to cause a <br />"backwater effect" and "drown out" the high velocity areas. For these reasons, ice cover formed <br />10 <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br /> <br /> <br />1 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />1 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />'I <br />J <br />ri <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.