Laserfiche WebLink
<br />BACKGROUND <br />The Green River and Flaming Gorge Dam <br />The Green River originates in western Wyoming, flows south through Wyoming, Utah, <br />and Colorado and merges with the Colorado River in southeastern Utah (Figure 1). The Green <br />River provides recreation, hydropower, irrigation water, and habitat for a number of fish species, <br />including the Federally endangered Colorado squawfish (Prychocheilus lucius), razorback sucker <br />(Xyrauchen texanus), humpback chub (Gila cypha) and bonytail (Gila elegans). Since October <br />of 1962, flows in the Green River have been regulated by Flaming Gorge Dam, located near the <br />border of Utah and Wyoming. Releases from the dam are determined by a number of factors, <br />including flood control, water use, and hydropower. Compared to pre-dam historical records,. <br />Flaming Gorge Dam has reduced the magnitude of peak spring flows and has increased the <br />magnitude of flows in the fall and winter. This can be seen in Figure 2, where the average flow <br />at the Jensen gaging station for each day of the year for the period 1946-1962 (pre-dam period of <br />record) is compared to the average flow for each day of the year for the period 1963-1997 (post- <br />dam). <br />Use of Flaming Gorge Dam as a peaking hydropower facility has also led to increased <br />daily fluctuations in flow at downstream locations during many seasons of the year. Winter <br />fluctuations in flow have been observed to increase the activity of some Green River endangered <br />fishes especially during ice breakup and formation of ice jams (Valdez and Masslich 1989, <br />Valdez 1994). Shoreline scouring resulting from ice breakup and movement has also been <br />suggested to be undesirable for overwintering endangered fish (USFWS 1992). Although, the <br />degree to which fluctuating flows in winter, ice breakup, and shoreline scouring affect <br />endangered fish is not well understood, it appears that it is desirable to avoid repeatedly or <br />prematurely breaking up ice covers that form on the river in areas used by overwintering <br />endangered fish. Consequently, information about the effects of fluctuating flows due to <br />hydropower or maintenance operations at Flaming Gorge Dam. on ice processes in the Green <br />River are needed. This need for additional information about the effects of winter flows on <br />conditions in overwintering areas for endangered fishes was also identified in the Biological <br />Opinion on the Operation of Flaming Gorge Dam (USFWS 1992). <br />The Study Reach <br />The study reach of the Green River extended from River Mile 248 to about River Mile <br />316 (Figure 3). Flaming Gorge Dam is located upstream of the study reach at River Mile 410. <br />As presented in Valdez and Masslich (1989), the study reach can be effectively divided into two <br />regions. The reach from Split Mountain Canyon to the Jensen Bridge comprises the upper <br />region. It has a moderate gradient with gravel-cobble substrate upstream and sand substrate <br />downstream. The lower region extends from the Jensen Bridge to Ouray Bridge and is generally <br />a low-gradient, meandering river with a substrate consisting primarily of sand. Upstream of the <br />study reach, where the Green River passes through Split Mountain Canyon, the river has a high <br />gradient and numerous rapids. <br />2 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />1 <br />1 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />1 <br />1 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />