My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
8165
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
8165
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:33 PM
Creation date
6/1/2009 11:59:55 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
8165
Author
Czapla, T. E.
Title
Genetics Management Plan (Revised).
USFW Year
1999.
USFW - Doc Type
Denver, Colorado.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
55
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
t <br />C. Humpback chub. The humpback chub was assigned "Priority 3" among the four endangered <br />species because the stocks are considered stable but small and localized in deep canyon river reaches. <br />Phenotypes of the humpback chub in the Yampa River and Desolation-Gray Canyons in the Green <br />River vary considerably and indicates possible hybridization with roundtail chubs at these two locations. <br />The Yampa River stock was assigned a Priority 2 designation among stocks within the species. Priority 3 <br />within the species was assigned to the Cataract Canyon stock and Priority 4 was assigned to the Desolation- <br />Gray Canyon stock, primarily because of the remoteness of these stocks and low potential for catastrophic <br />risk. <br />1. Black Rocks Canvon Stock. Fifteen adult humpback chubs should be collected from two <br />locations: Black Rocks Canyon and Westwater Canyon. These fish will be maintained at Horsethief State <br />Wildlife Area, Colorado, as a safeguard against extinction from a catastrophe. <br />D. Colorado pikeminnow. The Colorado pikeminnow was assigned "Priority 4" among the four <br />endangered fishes because the stocks are considered to be stable. However, the Upper Colorado River <br />stock (upstream from Westwater Canyon) is low in number and was assigned Priority 1 among Colorado <br />pikeminnow stocks. The other stocks were assigned Priorities 2 or 3. The stock in the Gunnison River is <br />small and declining. A fishway has been constructed and operated at the Redlands Irrigation Diversion <br />Dam since in 1996 which provides access to Colorado pikeminnow from the Colorado River. Through <br />October 1998, the operation of the fish ladder has allowed 23 Colorado pikeminnow to pass. <br />1. Upper Colorado River Stock (downstream to Lake Powelll. The Colorado prkemmnow has <br />been extirpated from its historic habitat between the Price-Stub Irrigation Diversion Dam and Rifle, <br />Colorado. Restoration stocking of this reach has been proposed by the Colorado Division of Wildlife. - <br />Wild fish should be stream spawned in paired coatings during 1999. Details of the augmentation plan to stock <br />using the stream spawned progeny have yet to be worked out. The general concept is to raise the progeny <br />intensively in for a period of 1 to 3 years to attain a size where survival is greatly enhanced. The majority of <br />these fish will be used to establish themselves in the river above the Frice-Stubb Irrigation Diversion Dam. In <br />addition, translocation of adults to above the Price-Stubb Irrigation Diversion Dam will potentially allow the <br />determination of adult movements from this section of river prior to passage being constructed. <br />IX. LITERATURE CITED <br />Allendorf, F.W. and S.R. Phelps. 1981. Use of allelic frequencies to describe population structure. <br />Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 38: 1502-1514. <br />Allendorf, F.W. and N. Ryman. 1987. Genetic management of hatchery stocks. Pages 141-159 in N. <br />Ryman and F. Utter, Editors. Population genetics and fisheries management. Washington Sea Grant <br />Program, University of Washington, Seattle. <br />Archer, D.L., L.R. Kaeding, B.D. Burdick, and C.W. McAda. 1985. Study of the endangered river fishes <br />of the Upper Colorado River. Draft fmal report. U.S. Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife <br />Service, Salt Lake City, Utah. 82 pp. <br />Archer, D.L., L.R. Kaeding, and H.M. Tyus. 1986. Colorado River fishes monitoring project. Final <br />report. U.S. Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service, Denver, Colorado. 64 pp. <br />Avise, J.C. 1989. Gene trees and organismal histories: a phylogenetic approach to population biology. <br />Evolution, 43: 1192-1208. <br />Barker, J.S.F. 1989, Population structure. Pages 75-80 ig~ W.G. Hill and F.C. Mackay, Editors. Evolution <br />and animal breeding. C.A.B. Intennational, Wallingford, United Kingdom. <br />t <br />22 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.