Laserfiche WebLink
t <br />1 <br />1 <br />t <br /> <br />1 <br />u <br />a <br /> <br /> <br />Table 1. Criteria used for identifiption and characterization of presumptive endangered fish stocks in the Upper <br />Colorado River Basin (Y=Yes, determined; U=Unknown, little or no information; ?=Undetermined, inoondusive or unagreed <br />upon results based on information available). See Appendix 2 for background information. <br /> Criteria' <br />Speces Presumptive Spawning Fidelity to Geographic Molecular Morphometric <br /> Stocks Sites/ Spawning Genetics <br /> Movements Sites <br />Razorback sucker Middle Green River Y Y Y ? U <br /> (Yampa and Middle <br /> Green River) <br /> Lower Green River U U Y ? U <br /> Upper Colorado River Y U Y ? U <br />Bonytail Upper Basin <br />Humpback chub Yampa River Y U Y ? Y <br /> Desolation-Gray Y U Y ? U <br /> Canyons <br /> Blade Rocks Canyon Y U ? ? U <br /> Westwater Canyon Y U ? ? U <br /> Cataract Canyon Y U Y ? U <br />Colorado Green/Yampa River Y Y Y ? U <br />pikeminnow <br /> Desolation-Gray Y Y Y ? U <br /> Canyons <br /> Upper Colorado River Y U Y ? U <br /> including Gunnison <br /> River <br />Definitions of Criteria: <br />Spawning sites/movements - Ripe fish collected on suspected spawning sites; larval fishes collected <br />downstream of suspected spawning sites. Migrations to/from spawning sites; <br />home ranges. <br />Fidelity to spawning sites - Fish return exclusively to the spawning sites they originated at. <br />Geographic - Stocks that are spatially separated from others by large distances (e.g., 100 river mites). <br />Molecular Genetic - Allozyme or mtDNA analyses indicating separation of stocks. <br />Morphometric -Systematic body measurements indigting differences among stodks/spedes. <br />V. STATUS AND TRENDS OF ENDANGERED FISH STOCKS AND CURRENT GENETIC <br />MANAGEMENT ACTIONS <br />Criteria for Determining Status and Trends of Endangered Fish Stocks. De+ ~n~ g the status and trends of <br />endangered fish stocks is imperative in making informed management decisions (Philipp et al. 1986). <br />Decisions on actions regazding endangered species must be made on a case-by-case basis using standard <br />criteria (Rohlf 1991) as developed here. The status of presumptive endangered fish stocks in the upper basin <br />is determined by: <br />1. Monitoring the distribution and relative abundance of presumptive stocks by species, <br />2. Documenting spawning and recruitment, <br />3. Determining the potential risk for extinction from catastrophes, and <br />4. Estimating the probability for immediate extinction. <br />Distribution and relative abundance of Colorado pikeminnow in the upper basin and humpback <br />chubs in Black Rocks and Westwater Canyons are estimated through the Recovery Program's Interagency <br />Standardized Monitoring Program (McAda et al. 1993). Data on the present relative abundance as well as <br />status and trends of the razorback sucker and nonnative fishes aze obtained through the basinwide razorback <br />~I <br />U <br />