Laserfiche WebLink
1 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />1 <br />1 <br /> <br />1 <br />1 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />1 <br /> <br /> <br />After the model was adjusted to reflect input from our first workshop, and data sources <br />for parameter estimation were identified, we began to accumulate data pertaining to all <br />population parameters for the Colorado squawfish populations. Three subpopulations <br />were identified and all available data were analyzed to provide the best possible <br />estimates for parameter values (see model section below): To determine our <br />effectiveness at finding data (and understanding them) we met with T. Czapla, C. <br />McAda ,and D. Osmundson to discuss the data we tabulated and the analyses we <br />performed. We also discussed the areas where data were sparse or nonexistent. <br />Finally, we held another workshop, similar to the initial one, in conjunction with the All- <br />Scientist meeting for the Upper Basin at Lake Powell to discuss model structure and <br />attended that workshop. <br />data sources for razorback sucker and humpback chub. Approximately 20 scientists <br />In this report, we provide specific models for three of the above fish species (data are <br />virtually nonexistent for bonytail chub), data synthesis required to estimate relevant <br />population parameters where possible, and some examples of how the models can be <br />used to determine target values or management targets for population stabilization or <br />enhancement. <br />3 <br />1 <br />