My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
8055 (2)
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
8055 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:32 PM
Creation date
6/1/2009 11:59:29 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
8055
Author
Crowl, T. A. and N. W. Bouwes.
Title
A Population Model for Four Endangered Colorado River Fishes - Final Report.
USFW Year
1998.
USFW - Doc Type
Logan, Utah.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
84
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br /> <br />1 <br />1 <br /> <br /> <br />J <br />r <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br /> <br />f <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />INTRODUCTION <br />Mathematical models can be useful tools for the conservation of threatened or <br />endangered species (Wootton and Bell 1992). Models fulfill 4 important functions for <br />these kinds of activities: 1) clarifying the critical data required to monitor the health of a <br />population; 2) determining the current status of data collection and analysis, and of the <br />population dynamics themselves; 3) aid in projecting the outcome of current <br />management strategies; and 4) providing insight into the most effective management <br />strategies given alternatives (Mertz 1971, Crouse et al. 1987, Lande 1988, Doak 1989, <br />Getz and Haight 1989, Menges 1990, Wootton and Bell 1992). <br />Historically, population models took relatively simplistic forms such as Lefkovitch or <br />Leslie Matrix models (sensu Ryel and Valdez 1994) in which transition probabilities <br />from one life stage to the next were used to determine how populations were <br />responding through time and how changes in the transition values might effect those <br />dynamics. It is now increasingly apparent that the spatial structure of populations <br />often has important effects on population dynamics (Holt 1985; Kareiva 1986, 1987; <br />Pulliam 1988). Incorporating population substructure into models and population <br />monitoring schemes may be critical to predict future population dynamics accurately <br />which may allow either different management strategies altogether (Lande 1988, <br />Pulliam 1988, Doak 1989) or at least a quantitative method for prioritizing where efforts <br />are to take place for population enhancement. <br />1 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.