My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9348
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
9348
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:34 PM
Creation date
6/1/2009 11:57:49 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
9348
Author
Crane, H. S.
Title
Fishery Investigations of the Glen Canyon and Flaming Gorge Impoundment Areas.
USFW Year
1959.
USFW - Doc Type
\
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
75
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
-15- <br />Aquatic Insects <br />A total of 66 known general of aquatic insects were collected from the <br />river and tributary streams. Identification of the forms collected was made <br />by Guy Musser, G. F. Edmunds and other members of the faculty, Department of <br />Biology, University of Utah. <br />Generally, there was a similarity in the insect fauns, of most of the <br />tributary streams. The differences in species composition iri collections <br />from the various tributaries appears to be due largely to sampling procedure. <br />Most of the streams sampled were very productive in both numbers and kinds <br />of insects (Table 5), although flash floods doubtlessly reduce their numbers <br />in certain areas. A reduction in the number of aquatic insects occurred <br />during the fall, which appeared to be due to the emergence of many of the <br />forms observed during the summer. The abundant insect fauna makes up a large <br />proportion of the diet of the dace and bluegill which occur in the tributary <br />streams. <br />Although mayfly nymphs were abundant in the streams and ponds, no stone <br />flies (Plecoptera) were collected, a few cast skins being the only evidence <br />of-this group. The paucity of these forms in the area may be due to the fact <br />that most of the tributaries are relatively small slow streams with high <br />summer water temperatures. G.F. Edmunds collected a few stonefly nymphs at <br />Aztec Greek in April 194g• It is quite possible that these insects are con- <br />fined to some of the larger and swifter tributaries. <br />In contrast to the las^ge numbers of aquatic insects present in the trib- <br />utaries, the Colorado and San Juan Rivers support sparse, though fairly di- <br />verse, populations of aquatic insects. Most of the aquatic insects collected <br />from the rivers were found attached to rocks, especially in the riffle areas, <br />or in small bays. Very few insects were found among the shifting sands of <br />the river bottom. This dearth of aquatic insects is doubtlessly one of the <br />factors responsible for the scarcity of fish, other than the herbivorous <br />flannelmouth sucker and omniverous channel catfish, in these rivers. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.