Laserfiche WebLink
DISCIISSION AND MANAGEMENT ISSIIES <br />Hydrology <br />Dam construction on the upper Colorado River-and its <br />.tributaries has drastically altered the .flow regime of the river. <br />In particular the maximum annual flows are reduced in magnitude <br />resulting in decreased overbank flood frequency and duration. <br />The altered hydrologic regime affects four major characteristics <br />of this fluvial ecosystem; (1) reduced interaction between the <br />River and wetlands which once were part of-the rivers floodplain; <br />(2) reduced salt flushing; (3) reduced alluvial sediment <br />deposition; (4) reduced recruitment events for cottonwood trees. <br />Each of these issues is discussed below. <br />(1) Reduced interaction between the Colorado River and <br />floodAlain. Overbank flooding occurs in the study area with <br />-flows of 40,000 cfs or greater. Historical-frequency of flows of <br />-this magnitude was once every 1.86 .years. .Presently, flood- <br />- frequency is closer to once per decade.- Reduction in the <br />frequency and duration of flooding has resulted in dissolution of <br />-one large.-river-wetland ecosystem and resulted in the creation of <br />.two distinct ecosystems which .are hydrologically isolated.' The <br />Colorado River ecosystem including-its bed and .bars is <br />hydrologically driven by its watershed in the Rocky Mountains. <br />The Moab .wetlands are hydrologically driven by Mill Creek <br />watershed waters from the, La Sal Mountains near Moab and their ~`' <br />application to-field for irrigation, as well as the discharge of <br />groundwaters from the Wingate and Paradox Formations. Today, the <br />Moab wetlands are supported totally by water of local origin. <br />This water is .tributary. to the. Colorado River, and periodically <br />the Colorado-floods through-these wetlands, but these-are rare <br />events precipitated by some of the largest snowpacks on record <br />whose melting exceeded the capacity of the regions reservoirs. <br />In the past there was biennial-interaction between these-two <br />ecosystems, and adult Colorado River fishes, as well as drifting <br />larvae, had ample opportunity to-move from the River during high <br />stage, into the Moab wetlands. where refuge in the numerous ponds <br />of wetland communities was available. Historical air photo <br />interpretation leads us to believe that all Moab wetlands are.- <br />natural, and irrigation has had no significant measurable effect <br />on their overall acreage or characteristics. <br />Historically,. Colorado River fishes-could have moved back to <br />the River as stage declined, or they could have survived the <br />summer and winter in these ponds (which are up to 5 feet-deep, <br />contained appreciable invertebrate and small fish communities, <br />.and relatively-high DO concentrations) for one or more years, and- <br />be flushed back into the-River during the next flood event which. <br />had a frequency of 1 out of every 1.86 years. In addition, high. <br />flow ,years on the Colorado River also were high precipitation. <br />73 <br />