My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9469
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
9469
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:35 PM
Creation date
6/1/2009 11:53:44 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
9469
Author
Colorado Water Conservation Board.
Title
Floodplain Information Report\
USFW Year
1995.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
44
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />' 3.0 HYDROLOGIC ANALYSIS <br />3.1 Existing Data <br />For locations where detailed existing hydrologic analyses were available, those analyses were used <br />' to obtain peak 50-year and 100-year flows. <br />Published floodplain studies prepared by FEMA for Delta, Colorado provided 50-year and 100- <br />' year flows at the upstream limit of this study. The floodplain study for Grand Junction provided <br />50-year and 100-year flows at the downstream limit of the study. <br />3.2 New H~gic Information <br />Hydrologic analyses of the 50-year and 100-year flood flows for the remainder of the hydrologic <br />points along the study reaches of the Gunnison River were accomplished by interpolation of the <br />known flow values. The peak flows per square mile for the 50-year and the 100-year frequencies <br />were virtually the same at both the upstream end of the study and the downstream end of the <br />study. Using the relationship of flow per square mile from the known values, the flow values <br />for the selected hydrologic locations on the Gunnison which did not already have a detailed <br />floodplain study were calculated. The drainage areas at those points were simply multiplied by <br />' the flow per square mile. The flow per square mile selected from the existing data is 3.3 cubic <br />feet per second per square mile (cfs/miz) for the 50-year flow and 3.7 cfs/mil for the 100-year <br />' flow. Because the flow/drainage area relationship was so constant throughout the study reach, <br />no regression equation had to be computed. <br />' 3.3 Hydrologic Findings <br />Table 3 shows the results of this analysis in tabular form. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />9 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.