Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I CHAPTER 2 <br />I GROUND RULES, ASSUMPTIONS AND ANALYSIS PROCEDURES <br />1 2.1 INTRODUCTION <br />The Executive Committee and the consultant team established ground rules in Phase 1 under which <br />the feasibility investigation of alternatives for supplying an average of 20,000 acre-feet of water in <br />those years when the forecast spring peak flows are between 12,900 cfs and 26,600 cfs would proceed. <br />The Executive Committee and the team also identified assumptions that are necessary to facilitate the <br />study. The purpose of this section is to detail the ground rules and assumptions that have been made <br />for this investigation and to provide explanation and justification for them. The frequency and <br />certainty with which the 20,000 acre-feet will be made available is detailed in the Flow Targets section <br />below. <br />2.2 GROUND RULES <br />2.2.1 Administration <br />Recommended alternatives from this investigation do not need to include recommendations for a <br />- - mechanism-for--administration-or e--1 pr-ot?n-ef watt--er-rel€-ased-or--otherwise-supplied-during the <br />spring peak to the head of the 15-Mile Reach. This is because there is unappropriated water available <br />during the spring peak in years when flows at the head of the 15-Mile Reach are in the range of <br />12,900 to 26,600 cfs. From an administrative standpoint, the river is under "free river" conditions, and <br />therefore administration of flows past intervening water rights is currently unnecessary. As specified in <br />the PBO, any new depletion during this period of the year may be covered under the PBO. For the <br />same reason, the conversion of water rights to instream flows in order to protect and convey flows to <br />the head of the 15-Mile Reach during the spring peak will not be considered further. <br />With regard to the secondary study purpose of providing flows in the late irrigation season, potential <br />administrative mechanisms will need to be identified to protect the water to and through the 15-Mile <br />Reach because the river is generally on call during that time of the year. <br />' During Phase 1, the issue of how bypassed diversions to storage would be administered has been <br />discussed. Several alternatives for administration exist. <br />¦ Bypassed diversions to storage would be credited toward a "paper fill" of the reservoir <br />and the reservoir would attempt to achieve a subsequent physical fill using a junior <br />refill right. This is essentially the administration agreed to by the SWAT team and used <br />to decree the Clinton Gulch, Green Mountain and Dillon refills. <br />¦ Bypassed diversions to storage would not be credited toward a paper fill under an <br />administrative policy such that bypasses are regulatory in nature and the reservoir <br />' would attempt to fill later under its own priority. <br /> <br />I P:\Data\GEN\CWCB\19665\Report Phase 2\FinalReport9.03\Final_CFOPS_Report(9-03).doc 15