Laserfiche WebLink
36 <br />Table 4. Summary of runoff flows in the Green and Yampa Rivers for representative wet, <br />normal, and dry years under pre- and post-Flaming Gorge conditions. Percentage <br />differences refer to the amount and direction of change from the pre-dam condition. <br /> Green river Yampa River <br />Condition Pre-dam Post-dam Difference Pre-dam Post-dam Difference <br /> (m3/s) (m3/s) (%) (m3/s) (m3/s) (%) <br />Wet 389.4 319.1 -22.0 295.5 319.1 +43.1 <br />Normal 368.5 241.0 -34.6 220.2 205.0 -6.9 <br />Dry 180.8 164.9 -8.8 100.8 99.3 -1.6 <br />Table 5. Summary of annual peak discharges in the Green and Yampa Rivers for <br />representative wet, normal, and dry years under pre- and post-Flaming Gorge conditions. <br />Percentage differences refer to the amount and direction of change from the pre-dam <br />condition. <br /> Green river Yampa River <br />Condition Pre-dam Post-dam Difference Pre-dam Post-dam Difference <br /> (m3/S) (m3/S) (%) (m3/S) (m3/S) (%) <br />Wet 816 510 -37.5 581 555 -4.5 <br />Normal 751 470 -37.4 479 496 +3.5 <br />Dry 337 314 -6.8 254 217 -14.6 <br />years average daily and peak discharges were about the same for both pre- and post-dam <br />periods. The peak discharges in the wet year comparison were also similar, but the mean <br />daily discharges were considerably higher for the post-dam runoff period. The opposite <br />phenomenon was observed in the dry year comparison, where the average daily flows for <br />the period were essentially the same, but the peaks differed by nearly 15%. <br />Several aspects of the runoff period are noteworthy. First, the runoff hydrographs <br />for the Yampa River and the Green River were commonly bimodal or polymodal. These <br />multiple spikes were more dramatic during normal and dry water years, and represented <br />two or more distinct snowmelt periods. Early-season peaks were probably associated <br />with snowmelt from the south-facing drainages, and late-season peaks from north-facing