My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
8279
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
8279
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:34 PM
Creation date
6/1/2009 11:37:24 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
8279
Author
Brown and Caldwell.
Title
Phase 1 Coordinated Facilities Water Availability Study for the Endangered Fishes of the Upper Colorado River.
USFW Year
2000.
USFW - Doc Type
\
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
110
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />' 2. A fee will be submitted as described in the PBO for new project depletions greater than <br />100 acre-feet/year. The fee is adjusted each year for inflation. The 1999 fee was $14.13 <br />' per acre-foot. <br />3. The Service will include individual incidental take statements in biological opinions for <br />' projects covered by the PBO. <br />4. Reinitiation stipulations will be included in all biological opinions for individual <br />' consultations under the umbrella of the PBO. <br />5. The Service will request that discretionary Federal control be retained for all <br />consultations under the PBO. <br />Future consultations that meet the criteria would avoid the likelihood of jeopardy and/or adverse <br />' <br />modification of critical habitat from depletion impacts. Projects that do not meet the criteria are <br />' not covered by the PBO, and therefore will require consultation outside of the Recovery <br />Program. <br />Participation in the measures identified in the PBO, and in the implementation of the alternatives <br />identified pursuant to this study to provide an annual average 20,000 acre-feet, will be strictly <br />' voluntary. <br />This report identifies specific facilities or property owned by public agencies and private parties. <br />Direct communication has not in all instances occurred with those parties, particularly with <br />regard to the preliminary identification of alternatives. Therefore, identification of alternatives is <br />not intended to, and does not, indicate agreement to participate by the person or entity involved <br />' in the implementation of any alternative. In order for any alternative to be implemented, the <br />affected parties must agree to implement that alternative. Specific issues and concerns with <br />regard to participation have been identified in this report, and the report makes some <br />' recommendations concerning potential incentives for parties to participate in the implementation <br />of identified alternatives. <br />' Review of present policy indicates that a lack of incentives exist for entities who are not <br />currently contemplating some action with a federal nexus. Consideration perhaps should be <br />given to developing incentives for participation in the Recovery Program by those entities <br />currently not proposing an action with a federal nexus. The consultant team in this report makes <br />suggestions in this regard. <br />2.3 ASSUMPTIONS <br />2.3.1 Model <br />Evaluation and analysis of the various alternatives in Phase I will be performed using StateMod, <br />the State of Colorado's Stream Simulation Model. StateMod was originally developed for the <br />p:\data\gen\Ocwcb\18133\report\phase-1\chap-2.doc 2-5
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.