Laserfiche WebLink
1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br /> <br />1 <br />1 <br /> <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />this amounts to -0.79% of the WOFBA stream of output over the study period. The employment <br />impact to the tribal economies is 85 average annual jobs foregone. <br />Table 6-C-2 Listing and Critical Habitat Impacts for the Tribal Lands: NPV <br />at 0,3, 5, and 10 Percent -(Sharing by Emplovment) <br />Changes in Output and Employment from WOFBA for <br />the Tribal Lands - Sharing by E mployment <br /> Million Percent Deviation <br /> 1990$ <br />Output <br />NPV 0 percent -232.169 -0.964 <br />NPV 3 percent -102.060 -0.793 <br />NPV 5 percent -63.567 -0.681 <br />NPV 10 percent -24.444 -0.456 <br />ANN 3 percent -5.160 -1.133 <br /> Persons Percent Deviation <br />Employment <br />Average Annual 85 -0.891 <br />Incremental Jobs Foregone <br />By 2040 this would amount to a reduction of total output of $35 million in an economy <br />producing $4,613.8 million in total output.27 The distribution by sector would follow the 16% <br />rate since the data to do a more detailed sharing are not available. <br />2. Share by Population <br />Table 6-C-1 reports the share of regional population accounted for by the tribal economies as <br />29% and this would imply that the value of the listing and critical habitat economic impacts <br />borne by the tribal economies is $184.98 million (NPV at 3% discount rate - see Table 6-C-3). <br />As a share of the tribal economic activity this amounts to approximately 0.8% of the <br />' z' Multiplying the tribal sharing by employment coefficient, 16%, by any output change in Table 6-13-3 gives <br />the tribal share of the output impact for the selected sector and year. <br />' 51 <br />1