Laserfiche WebLink
1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />Table 6-B-5 Changes From WOFBA for the Region: NPV at Discount Rates of 0, 3, 5, and <br />10 Percent - Listing and Critical Habitat. <br />Changes in Output and Employment From WOFBA <br />for the San Juan River Region <br /> Million 1990$ Percent <br />Deviation <br />Output <br />NPV 0 percent -1451.059 -0.964 <br />NPV 3 percent -637.872 -0.793 <br />NPV 5 percent -397.292 -0.681 <br />NPV 10 percent -152.776 -0.456 <br />Annualized 3 percent -32.25 -1.133 <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br /> <br />1 <br />Employment Persons Percent <br />Deviation <br />Average Annual Incremental -530 -0.891 <br />Jobs Foregone <br />C. Tribal Share of Impacts <br />The impacts are computed for the four tribes taken together since there were insufficient data to <br />analyze the tribes separately.25 Since the Navajo Nation is the largest of the four, this approach <br />will bias the impacts upward for the other tribes and downward (albeit very slightly) for the <br />Navajo. The employment share represents a lower bound and the population share an upper <br />bound (see section 3-D). Table 6-C-1 reports the total tribal share of economic activity for the <br />10-county region to be 16% based on employment and 29% based on population. <br />' "Appendix A lists the information received by the tribes in response to a survey sent out in May of 1995. At <br />a minimum, on and off-reservation employment figures, which were not available, would have been required to analyze <br />the tribes separately. <br />49 <br />