My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9387
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
9387
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:35 PM
Creation date
6/1/2009 11:37:02 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
9387
Author
Brookshire, D. S., M. McKee and S. Stewart.
Title
A Four Corners Regional Focus on the Economic Impact of Critical Habitat Designation for teh Razorback Sucker, Humpback Chub, Colorado Squawfish, and Bonytail.
USFW Year
1997.
USFW - Doc Type
Albuquerque.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
94
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
1 <br />' The direct impacts were constructed b translating the impacts of mans <br />by gang flows, for the <br />' purpose of protecting endangered fishes, on planned water development projects into changes in <br />the economic activity in the region. These impacts were incorporated into the I-O models <br />developed to analyze the economic consequences of steps taken to preserve and recover the listed <br />fishes. Modifying or eliminating projects for which there is insufficient water would be <br />' represented as a negative shock to the economic activity in the baseline scenario. These shocks <br />from foregone water development and associated construction costs occur throughout the study <br />' period. <br /> 1. Agriculture Impacts <br /> Foregone agriculture revenues were determined by removing irrigated acreage from the <br /> b <br />li <br />d <br /> ase <br />ne an <br />treating the withdrawn lands as if they were planted using the existing <br /> cropping pattern percentages. Because an agricultural entity is more likely to retire <br /> lower-valued crops first, this method provides an upper bound on impacts due to fish <br /> protection measures. These impacts are entered as supply shocks in the manner described <br /> in Chapter 3. <br /> <br /> 2. Construction <br />Impacts <br /> Water unavailable for use implies that some water development projects will not be <br /> feasible. To account for this impact, the project construction activity is subtracted from <br /> the construction sector. <br />3. Electric Power Impacts <br />Changing the operation of the Navajo Dam will result in a change in the timing of the <br />output of hydroelectric power. For the City of Farmington this will necessitate purchase <br />of power from the grid. This is modeled as a reduction in the level of activity in the <br />T.C.U. sector. <br /> <br />1 <br />35 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.