My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9667
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
9667
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:37 PM
Creation date
6/1/2009 11:34:35 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
9667
Author
Brouder, M. J. and T. L. Hoffnagle.
Title
Paria River Native Fish Monitoring - 1996-1997 Annual Report.
USFW Year
1997.
USFW - Doc Type
Flagstaff, AZ.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
56
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
~ ~ <br />• <br />Paris River Fish Monitoring Annual Report <br />summer temperature and year round high turbidity keep this species from invading the Paris. <br />Rainbow trout are predators of larval fishes (Mazsh and Douglas 1997) and no small <br />flannelmouth suckers have been captured in the Colorado River below the Paris (Arizona Game <br />and Fish Department 1996a). It is hypothesized that this is because cold-shocked larvae are <br />being consumed by rainbow trout, although no data has substantiated this. <br />Conclusion <br />• <br />The Paris River fish community remains limited to flannelmouth sucker, speckled dace <br />and the few uncommon species that are captured only in or near its mouth. Both flannelmouth <br />sucker and speckled dace continue to spawn in the Paris, with only speckled dace successfully <br />recruiting in 1998. However, flannelmouth sucker are along-lived species (Hinckley 1991) that <br />probably does not require annual recruitment to maintain a healthy population. Continued <br />monitoring and, possibly, management actions will be necessary to ensure that the fishes of this <br />dynamic stream are maintaining themselves. <br />Recommendations <br />I believe that the protocols used in this monitoring/reseazch should be evaluated to ensure <br />that the data are being effectively and efficiently collected. For example, Data collected prior to <br />1998 was collected whenever time permitted. The monthly sampling scheme implemented in <br />~ 1998 is an effort to ensure that sampling is conducted during all periods of the year. It is <br />expected that following the 1999 field season, the monitoring schedule will be reduced to spring, <br />summer and fall, with more intensive sampling to be continued during the spring spawning <br />period. However, any changes made to this protocol must be comparable with data collected <br />from previous years. The following are some suggested changes for 1999 that will provide <br />additional information, but will be compatible with previous data. <br />1 -Continue sampling the Paris River monthly, except from 1 April through 3 June, when trips <br />should be conducted at least biweekly to better document spawning time and presence of YOY <br />• 22 Arizam (}mne Bt Fish Deportment Hotrmgk 1999, Paris River 1998 Amoral Report <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.