My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7910
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
7910
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:31 PM
Creation date
6/1/2009 11:33:59 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
7910
Author
Bovee, K. D. and R. T. Milhous.
Title
Hydraulic Simulation In Instream Flow Studies
USFW Year
1978.
USFW - Doc Type
Theory And Techniques, Instream Flow Information Paper No. 5.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
134
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
rapid periods of scour and fill, the rating curve approach will not work <br />as well because the cross section itself will be-different each time it <br />is measured. What was a pool is now a sandbar. In this situation, the <br />use of two or three replications of the Manning equation, with data <br />collected at different flows, would be preferred for hydraulic simulation, <br />each addressing the various channel configurations. <br />Under the condition of dynamic equilibrium, it is immaterial that <br />pools are converted. to sandbars. In order for this to happen, a sandbar <br />somewhere was converted to a pool. Therefore, if a dynamic equilibrium <br />has been assumed or determined, the relative proportion of pools and <br />bars should remain fairly constant even though their positions change <br />with time. <br />SUMMARY OF POTENTIAL SITUATIONS AND <br />RECOMMENDED APPROACHES <br />The preceding discussions are designed to help the field investigator <br />select a hydraulic simulation technique which is consistent with the <br />type of study being conducted and the type of river being studies. <br />Several different settings (type of study, type of river) which could <br />confront the investigator, and the suggested hydraulic simulation approach <br />for each situation are summarized in Table 6. Additionally, Table 6 <br />includes the page numbers in the text which discuss a particular simula- <br />tion approach or its limitations. <br />The approaches suggested in Table 6 are given with the caveat that <br />the stream is in equilibrium, or very nearly so. If the stream is <br />currently in dis-equilibrium, or a change in equilibrium states is <br />anticipated due to some change in watershed characteristics, stream flow <br />pattern, land use, etc., it is necessary to predict what the channel <br />will be like under new equilibrium conditions. Given this situation, <br />the only way to simulate the hydraulic characteristics of the new channel <br />is to use the Manning equation, preferably using the gradually varied <br />flow (step-backwater) computation procedure. <br />Finally, the level of field intensity required depending on the <br />potential for conflict with other water uses is considerably different. <br />One would prefer to assume that the conflict with other water-uses will <br />be small, so that the cost of data collection could be minimized. <br />However, unless there is clear evidence to the contrary, one should <br />assume that there will be some conflict with other water uses, and that <br />an instream flow recommendation will be contested. The approach used <br />should be selected accordingly. <br /> <br />57
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.