Laserfiche WebLink
similar to the one shown in Figure S. Such streams are usually relatively <br />stable between periods of high flow. Care should be taken not to overlap <br />the high flow period during the data collection pro` cess. <br />If a point of interest is located just upstream from its juncture <br />with a larger stream, the flow in the larger stream may control the stage <br />in the smaller stream. This phenomenon is called "variable backwater," <br />because at some times of the year the backwater is present, and at other <br />times it is either absent or- of much reduced extent in the tributary <br />stream. The simplest solution to the problem of variable backwater is to <br />avoid areas where they occur. If this is not possible, a stage-discharge <br />relationship can be established during the period of the year when the <br />backwater is not present or is of reduced extent. Assessment of the <br />backwater during high flow periods should be tied to the stage-discharge <br />relationship of the main stem river. <br />Other factors commonly influencing the stage-discharge relationship <br />include aquatic vegetation and ice. The effect of aquatic vegetation is <br />to increase the roughness and to decrease the cross-sectional area of the <br />channel. The result is an increase in stage for a given discharge in <br />comparison to the channel without aquatic vegetation. In streams with an <br />attached algae, such as Cladophora, the stage-discharge,relationship when <br />the algae is dormant may be much different than while it is growing <br />rapidly. In this situation, it may be necessary to construct two rating <br />curves, one for the growing season and one for the non-growing season. <br />Ice has a complex impact on the stage-discharge relationship. The <br />presence of ice decreases the cross-sectional area, changes the wetted <br />perimeter, and changes the roughness. The types of changes involved. <br />depend on whether the ice is surface-formed (sheet ice) or bottom-formed <br />(anchor ice). It is enerall advisable not to attempt to construct a <br />rating curve, or use the Manni n e uati.o n when i ce i s red sen77 n the <br />stream. <br />For the most part, these generalised limitations should serve as <br />warnings to the field practitioner, not prohibitions. A stage-discharge <br />relationship may be developed under any of the conditions mentioned above. <br />However, if these conditions exist, extra care in study planning and data <br />collection are warranted. <br />LIMITATIONS TO THE USE OF THE MANNING EQUATION <br />From the instream flow assessment standpoint, the greatest advantage <br />in the use of Manning's equation is that only one set of measurements is <br />needed to calibrate the equation. For an agency charged with determining <br />instream flow requirements of many streams, frequently with little time or <br />resources to accomplish the task, this advantage may be extremely <br />attractive. Unfortunately, the same factors giving the advantage are also <br />involved in the limitations to the approach. <br /> <br />ZS