My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7910
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
7910
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:31 PM
Creation date
6/1/2009 11:33:59 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
7910
Author
Bovee, K. D. and R. T. Milhous.
Title
Hydraulic Simulation In Instream Flow Studies
USFW Year
1978.
USFW - Doc Type
Theory And Techniques, Instream Flow Information Paper No. 5.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
134
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
The stage-discharge relationship for Oak Creek near Corvallis, <br />Oregon, is given in Figure 3. <br />To determine the stage for any cross section, a least-squares <br />equation is determined from a log-log plot of discharge against stage. <br />For any interpolated or extrapolated discharge, the stage is calculated <br />directly from this empirical equation. <br />PREDICTING THE VELOCITY DISTRIBUTION <br />If the velocity distribution is measured for each flow of interest, <br />the data can be used directly and no analytical procedure is-needed to <br />estimate the velocity distribution. In most cases, only a limited amount <br />of resources is available to do field work in any particular i nstream flow <br />study; hence, estimates must be made of the velocity distribution of flows <br />for which velocities were not measured. <br />Velocity predictions are made using techniques which are similar to <br />those used to predict stage. However, for any discharge there is only one <br />stage, whereas the velocity varies from place to place across the section. <br />It is important here to define what is meant by a velocity distribution in <br />instream flow studies. Figure 4 illustrates two ways of expressing the <br />velocity distribution in a channel. Figure 4a shows the distribution as a. <br />series of contour lines connecting points of equal velocity. Figure 4b <br />shows the velocity distribution as a series of mean velocities in a group <br />of adjacent channel subdivisions. The conceptualization of the velocity <br />distribution for most instream flow studies is the type shown in Figure <br />4b. Essentially, each subsection or channel segment is treated as a <br />separate channel, with its own depth, substrate, and average velocity. <br />Any number of subdivisions may be used to define the velocity distribution <br />in this manner; the more channel segments, the more detailed the <br />description of the velocity distribution. In actual practice, around 20 <br />subdivisions are most commonly used, although.there is no firm limitation <br />to this number. <br />In the following discussions, approaches to estimating the velocity <br />distribution in a. cross section are described. The first section <br />describes the use of the Manning equation where no velocity measurements <br />are made to calibrate the equation. The second section discusses the <br />calibration of Manning's n with a series of measured velocities at one <br />flow. The third section describes a procedure using more than one set of <br />measured velocities. <br />MANNING EQUATION WITH NO VELOCITY MEASUREMENTS <br />This approach requires the stage-discharge relationship to be known <br />from the previous computation procedures. Other data requirements <br />include the dimensions of the cross section and the slope (Sh if uniform <br />flow assumption is made, Se if gradually varied flow). <br />15
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.