Laserfiche WebLink
analysis, (2) range and optimum analysis, (3) parameter overlap, and <br />(4) indirect parameter analysis. <br />Accompanying each set of probability curves is an outline des- <br />cribing: (1) source material used in the construction of the curves, <br />(2) analysis technique(s) used, (3) an Instream Flow Group (IFG) <br />evaluation rating for each curve, (4) comments concerning specific <br />curves, and (5) references cited. <br />The IFG evaluation for each curve was developed by adherence to cer- <br />tain guidelines. An excellent rating was given to those curves for <br />which frequency analysis was used on a large number of observations from <br />a wide variety of conditions. 'In addition, for this rating a chi-square <br />test was required that showed no significant difference in the frequency <br />of observations within the optimum (p<0.10). <br />A rating of good was assigned when frequency analysis could be <br />used, but either the number of observations or the variety of conditions <br />observed, was limited. Additionally, if a chi-square test of the opti- <br />mum showed no significant difference in frequency at p <0.25, but >0.10, <br />the curve was rated good regardless of the number of observations. <br />The- rating of fair was given if frequency analysis could be used, <br />with a severely limited number of observations (< 50), or if range and <br />optimum, parameter overlap, or indirect analyses were the only analysis <br />techniques capable of constructing the curve. Additionally, if a chi- <br />square test showed significant (p>0.25) variance within the optimum, the <br />curve was rated fair regardless of the number of observations. <br />`i V <br />