Laserfiche WebLink
THE USE OF COMBINATION PROBABILITIES <br />IN THE IFG INCREMENTAL METHODOLOGY <br />The IFG incremental methodology is rather unique among Instream <br />flow assessment procedures. At first glance, there appear to be few <br />common features among various riverine habitat alterations: stream <br />dewatering, flow augmentation, channelization, bank stabilization, <br />habitat improvement, or sedimentation. Each appears to be a unique <br />problem, requiring a unique solution. However, each of these problems <br />involves some alteration of river hydraulics, and the responses of <br />different species to those changes. Thus, it is possible to utilize a <br />standard methodological approach in the solution of these problems. <br />The Incremental Method was developed by personnel of the Coopera- <br />tive Instream Flow Service Group, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Fort <br />Collins, Colorado. The IFG incremental method allows quantification of <br />the amount of potential habitat available for a species and life history <br />phase, in a given reach of stream, at different streamflow regimes, <br />with different channel configurations and slopes. <br />This method is composed of four components: (1) simulation of the <br />stream; (2) determination of the distribution of combinations of depths, <br />velocities, substrates, and cover objects, by area; (3) determination of <br />a composite probability of use for each combination of depth, velocity, <br />substrate, and cover (where applicable) found within the stream reach, <br />for each species and life history phase under investigation; and (4) the <br />calculation of a weighted usable area (roughly a habitat's carrying <br />capacity based on physical conditions alone) for each discharge, species, <br />and life history phase under investigation. <br />STREAM REACH SIMULATION <br />The purpose of a stream reach simulation is the determination of <br />the distribution of depths, velocities, and bottom types within the <br />channel at different levels of stream flow. Several hydraulic simula- <br />tion techniques are available, ranging in difficulty from taking many <br />current meter measurements at each discharge to be simulated, to sim- <br />ulating many discharges from one set of field measurements. A detailed <br />description of the theoretical and field measurement considerations will <br />be available under a separate title ("Theoretical Considerations, Data <br />Collection, and Cross-section Analysis for Assessing Hydraulic Changes in <br />Natural Stream Channels," IFIP 5, Cooperative Instream Flow Service <br />Group, U.S.F.W.S., Ft. Collins, CO - in preparation). <br />29 <br />