My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7922
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
7922
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:31 PM
Creation date
6/1/2009 11:33:08 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
7922
Author
Bovee, K. D.
Title
A Guide To Stream Habitat Analysis Using The Instream Flow Incremental Methodology, Instream Flow Information Paper No. 12.
USFW Year
1982.
USFW - Doc Type
\
Copyright Material
NO
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
273
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
water balance of recommended flows serves as a first level check of the <br />accuracy of the results. <br />The investigator must also be concerned with the relationships between <br />discharge, sediment yield, and channel structure. Channel dimensions are <br />largely determined by the bankfull or dominant discharge. Changes in channel <br />dimensions due to changes in the dominant discharge can be estimated through <br />the use of hydraulic geometry equations. The shape and pattern of the channel <br />are primarily determined by the amount and size of the sediment transported by <br />the stream. Changes in shape and pattern are predictable when the sediment/ <br />discharge ratio is altered, but actual quantification of a new channel <br />structure requires the use of sediment transport models and considerable <br />expertise. <br />Discharge and channel structure combine to define the range of physical <br />microhabitat conditions available to a species. Chapter 7 discusses the <br />Physical Habitat Simulation System, with particular reference to microhabitat <br />criteria, cover and substrate quantification, and the estimation of passage <br />flows over natural barriers and through culverts. Several types of micro- <br />habitat criteria can be used in the Physical Habitat Simulation System <br />(PHABSIM): binary criteria, preference curves, multivariate suitability <br />functions, and combinations of preference curves and suitability functions. <br />All criteria are used to estimate a joint preference of a fish for a combina- <br />tion of hydraulic and structural features at a specific location in a stream. <br />The joint preference factor is found by multiplication of weighting factors <br />for each variable when binary criteria or preference curves are used. The <br />joint preference factor is computed directly when the multivariate suitability <br />function is used. The advantages of the preference curve are that it can be <br />constructed and modified by professional judgement and can represent very <br />complex or discontinuous mathematical functions. The advantage of the multi- <br />variate approach is the inclusion of interactions among variables in the joint <br />preference factor. <br />Cover and substrate are often represented by very complex, discontinuous <br />functions. Therefore, preference curves are usually used to depict cover and <br />substrate characteristics. The use of cover and substrate information in <br />PHABSIM involves the development of a numerical code to depict various types <br />and combinations of these characteristics, and a curve to describe the prefer- <br />ences of an organism for each combination. Cover can also be treated as a <br />discrete variable, with separate depth and velocity criteria associated with <br />each cover type. <br />Passage flows over natural barriers are evaluated by computing the width <br />of stream meeting the clearance requirements of a species at each flow. <br />Culverts present unique passage barriers and are evaluated by computing the <br />time required for a fish to negotiate a culvert at different streamflows. <br />Channel modification to enhance the physical structure of the stream is <br />one way to increase or maintain the availability of habitat. This alternative <br />is most feasible when channels have already been modified to increase water <br />conveyance or when water supplies are so short that negotiation over instream <br />flows will not succeed. Structural modifications to improve habitat include <br />artificial cover devices, deflectors, weirs, and headgates. Nonstructural <br />modifications include deepening pools, raising the elevation of riffles, <br />ix
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.