Laserfiche WebLink
9 <br />Another problem is that the Service should probably use a different method <br />of calculating current water depletions. That point will be covered in <br />more detai] later. A biological opinion for the project is now in progress. <br />PART V. Mitigation Formula for Moon Lake Electric Project <br />The most recent application of the Windy Gap Conservation approach is on <br />the Moon Lake Electric powerplant project in Utah. This project would <br />deplete about 21,730 acre-feet of water per year from the Green River. The <br />project, like Windy Gap, will have no detectable local major impacts on <br />endangered fish species; through its water depletion, however, it will <br />have an'impact on the basin wide conservation plan for recovery. <br />The Green River at Green River, Utah, gage was selected as the appropriate <br />gage for computing present water depletions in the Basin. Like the Cisco <br />gage, it has a long record (continuous record dates back to 1904). <br />~. <br />During meetings with Moon Lake Electric, it came to FWS' attention that <br />Water and Power Resources Service may have computer data on hand that <br />would indicate the current level of depletion at the Green River gage. <br />. .~ <br />A check was made at the WPRS office in Salt Lake City. Fortunately, <br />some data was available. WPRS indicated that they had predevelopment <br />and present flows at several gages in the Colorado and Green River, <br />including the Cisco and Green River gages. This information was devel- <br />oped as part of the Colorado-River Storage Project Data Base. <br />The data was pulled by WPRS'and delivered to the Salt Lake City Area Office <br />of FWS... Area Office personnel called me and read the pertinent data over <br />the,, phone.. An estimate I f the Moon Lake's share of the conservation plan _ <br />..- - ; <br />