My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7951
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
7951
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:32 PM
Creation date
6/1/2009 11:31:51 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
7951
Author
Boudreaux, J.
Title
Techniques For Computing Endangered Species Mitigation For Water Development Projects In The Upper Colorado River Basin.
USFW Year
1981.
USFW - Doc Type
\
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
'• ,~~~~TECNNIQUES FOR COMPUTING ENDANGERED SPECIES MITIGATION FOR WATER DEVELOPMENT <br />PROJECTS IN THE UPPER COLORADO RIVER BASIN emu,... TG,~ ~,'l/~,;~ <br />by John Boudreaux, Hydrologist ~`l`~ ~'•~' ~'~ ~ l'1G~,y <br />Denver Regional Office ~~~' <br />PART I. Introduction <br />The purpose of this paper is to list the precise mechanism for computing <br />a water development project's fair share of the cost of a comprehensive <br />management plan for recovering and delisting endangered fish species in <br />the Upper Colorado River BasirJ. The division point between the Upper <br />and Lower Basins is arbitrarily taken to be Lake Powell on the mainstem <br />Colorado•River. Obviously, the recovery of the fishes will not be <br />limited to the Upper Basin, but since Lake Powell does prevent a mixing <br />of Upper and Lower Basin fish, it is logical that two separate manage- <br />ment plans could be developed, each pertaining to an appropriate part of <br />the overall basin. <br />(Y <br />There will be some common, shared benefits from the two management <br />plans, of course. For example, if water rights are bought in the Upper <br />Basin to use for fish instream flow needs, this obviously helps to <br />satisfy instream flow needs in the Lower Basin. Another possibility is <br />that a hatchery would be constructed to raise endangered fishes to be <br />stocked in both the Upper and [_ower Basins. <br />Similarities aside, the recovery of the fishes would he more easily <br />achieved with separate management plans, so this paper deals only with a <br />plan for the Upper Basin. The Upper Basin can itself be separated into <br />. two sub-basins, namely the main stem Colorado River and the Green River. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.