Laserfiche WebLink
'• ,~~~~TECNNIQUES FOR COMPUTING ENDANGERED SPECIES MITIGATION FOR WATER DEVELOPMENT <br />PROJECTS IN THE UPPER COLORADO RIVER BASIN emu,... TG,~ ~,'l/~,;~ <br />by John Boudreaux, Hydrologist ~`l`~ ~'•~' ~'~ ~ l'1G~,y <br />Denver Regional Office ~~~' <br />PART I. Introduction <br />The purpose of this paper is to list the precise mechanism for computing <br />a water development project's fair share of the cost of a comprehensive <br />management plan for recovering and delisting endangered fish species in <br />the Upper Colorado River BasirJ. The division point between the Upper <br />and Lower Basins is arbitrarily taken to be Lake Powell on the mainstem <br />Colorado•River. Obviously, the recovery of the fishes will not be <br />limited to the Upper Basin, but since Lake Powell does prevent a mixing <br />of Upper and Lower Basin fish, it is logical that two separate manage- <br />ment plans could be developed, each pertaining to an appropriate part of <br />the overall basin. <br />(Y <br />There will be some common, shared benefits from the two management <br />plans, of course. For example, if water rights are bought in the Upper <br />Basin to use for fish instream flow needs, this obviously helps to <br />satisfy instream flow needs in the Lower Basin. Another possibility is <br />that a hatchery would be constructed to raise endangered fishes to be <br />stocked in both the Upper and [_ower Basins. <br />Similarities aside, the recovery of the fishes would he more easily <br />achieved with separate management plans, so this paper deals only with a <br />plan for the Upper Basin. The Upper Basin can itself be separated into <br />. two sub-basins, namely the main stem Colorado River and the Green River. <br />