Laserfiche WebLink
protection from erosion. They also play an important part in <br />habitat complexity today in bank shading, root-wads and debris <br />piles. <br />Construction and operation of Navajo Dam has had an impact on the <br />flood frequency of the river, especially in the portion above Four <br />Corners. Pre- and post-dam flood frequency analyses indicate that <br />the magnitude and frequency of flooding at Shiprock has been <br />greatly reduced. For example, the 100 year flood was reduced by <br />755. The effect at the Bluff gage was much different. Since the <br />large magnitude floods are usually produced by storm events in late <br />summer and fall, the lower part of the river is less affected by <br />the dam. At this lower gage, the 100 year flood was reduced by <br />only 35~. Reduction in peak flooding would contribute to the <br />stability of the river channel. <br />While considerably more channelized than in the early part of the <br />century, the river is .still dynamic. Analysis of aerial <br />photography from 1988 to 1992 indicates continuing adjustment in <br />channel alignment, although at a reduced rate compared to the <br />situation in the first half of the century. <br />Narrative history would lead us to believe the channel described <br />around the turn of the century and as seen in the 1934 photography <br />was not typical of the channel earlier in history. Unfortunately, <br />we do not know the condition of the river in these times prior to <br />the increased sedimentation documented in the literature. <br />As a more natural hydrograph is returned by re-operation of Navajo <br />Dam, there is some uncertainty as to the effect on channel <br />dynamics. In March 1992, 11 river cross-sections were established <br />to allow measurement of channel change in relation to different <br />hydrographs. Surveys of these cross-sections in March and again <br />in July demonstrated that scour exceeded deposition on average <br />during the spring runoff period in 1992. However, the scour was <br />not excessive for the 1992 hydrograph. Results from these cross- <br />section surveys over the duration of the study will be compared to <br />long term cross-section measurement at USGS gages for comparison to <br />long term trends. <br />Sediment sampling at 9 sites along the San Juan River at 5 times <br />during the runoff period indicated a general increase in sediment <br />concentration with distance downstream, with the largest increase <br />between Shiprock and Four Corners. Sampling was done during non- <br />storm periods with little or no tributary inflow below Shiprock to <br />assess the capacity of the river to remove sediment from the <br />system. The increase in suspended sediment with distance down <br />river corresponds with the net scour from the cross-section <br />measurements. While further sediment sampling is needed to <br />quantify the capacity for sediment transport, early indications are <br />that the system does have excess sediment transport capacity during <br />the peak runoff period, especially in the reach from Navajo dam to <br />15 <br />