Laserfiche WebLink
Razorback suckers were collected from the Gila River and <br />Bonita, Carrizo, and Cedar creeks during seining surveys <br />(Table 6). Gila kiver collections were within a few days of <br />stocking while tributary collections were 2-3 months after. <br />Overall, native fishes were more abundant and diverse in <br />tributaries than in mainstem rivers (Table 6). Identification of <br />catostomid larvae from the Salt River remains to be completed. <br />While unlikely, it is possible that some specimens in these <br />collections may be razorback sucker fry stocked in late spring in <br />Canyon and Carrizo creeks.. <br />Razorback sucker were not collected during reservoir surveys <br />in March 1985. Delta areas and nearby shoreline areas were <br />sampled intensively 4-5 days on each reservoir. Non-native <br />fishes dominated catch with largemouth bass (Micropterus <br />salmoides) and carp (Cyprinus carUio) most abundant (Table 7). <br />Sonora sucker (Catostomus insignis) was the only native species <br />collected. <br />Post-stocking dispersal and predation studies were conducted <br />in conjunction with stocking 25,875 razorback suckers 90 mm TL t <br />22 (62-185), i3-15 September 1985. Dispersal of stocked <br />razorback sucker was downstream with only one fish taken in the <br />hoop net 0.5 km above. Initial catch in the net 0.5 km <br />downstream was high but quickly dropped off after stocked fish <br />began to disperse out of the stocking area (Fig. 1). Movement <br />slowed during the afternoon hours but increased throughout the <br />night with the net 1.5 km downstream collecting increased numbers <br />ti <br />of razorbacks during nighttime movements. Hoop net catches <br />-6- <br />