My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
8076
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
8076
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:32 PM
Creation date
6/1/2009 11:31:05 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
8076
Author
Brooks, J. E.
Title
Annual Reintroduction and Monitoring Report for Razorback Sucker
USFW Year
1986.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Razorback suckers were collected from the Gila River and <br />Bonita, Carrizo, and Cedar creeks during seining surveys <br />(Table 6). Gila kiver collections were within a few days of <br />stocking while tributary collections were 2-3 months after. <br />Overall, native fishes were more abundant and diverse in <br />tributaries than in mainstem rivers (Table 6). Identification of <br />catostomid larvae from the Salt River remains to be completed. <br />While unlikely, it is possible that some specimens in these <br />collections may be razorback sucker fry stocked in late spring in <br />Canyon and Carrizo creeks.. <br />Razorback sucker were not collected during reservoir surveys <br />in March 1985. Delta areas and nearby shoreline areas were <br />sampled intensively 4-5 days on each reservoir. Non-native <br />fishes dominated catch with largemouth bass (Micropterus <br />salmoides) and carp (Cyprinus carUio) most abundant (Table 7). <br />Sonora sucker (Catostomus insignis) was the only native species <br />collected. <br />Post-stocking dispersal and predation studies were conducted <br />in conjunction with stocking 25,875 razorback suckers 90 mm TL t <br />22 (62-185), i3-15 September 1985. Dispersal of stocked <br />razorback sucker was downstream with only one fish taken in the <br />hoop net 0.5 km above. Initial catch in the net 0.5 km <br />downstream was high but quickly dropped off after stocked fish <br />began to disperse out of the stocking area (Fig. 1). Movement <br />slowed during the afternoon hours but increased throughout the <br />night with the net 1.5 km downstream collecting increased numbers <br />ti <br />of razorbacks during nighttime movements. Hoop net catches <br />-6- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.