Laserfiche WebLink
<br />.~ ~~ <br />Duchesne River drainage. As a result of these and many other diversions and dams, the <br />Duchesne River is a heavily depleted stream system. Maddux et al. (1993) reported <br />that fifty-three percent of the water from the Duchesne River is depleted through water <br />diversions and 'impoundments. Today, additional reservoirs and canals are being proposed <br />to be built for within basin purposes as part of the Central Utah Project. <br />Annual mean flow is greater near Randlett than at Myton because of the <br />contribution of the Uinta River. For the period of overlapping gaging records since <br />1943, annual runoff is sometimes more than 250 hectometers (200,000 of/yr) <br />greater near Randlett than at Myton. In drought years, however, the annual runoff at <br />both gaging stations has been nearly the same (Fig. 3A). Periods of higher annual runoff <br />have occurred between 1940 and 1950, 1965 and 1970, and 1980 and 1985. The <br />average annual runoff since 1940 has been about 350 hectometers (300,000 of/yr) at <br />Myton and 500 hectometers (400,000 of/yr) near Randlett. Gaging at Myton began in <br />1912, and average annual runoff for the period 1910 to 1920 was about 700 <br />hectometers (600,000 of/yr) of which is approximately twee the current runoff. <br />The magnitude of the annual maximum flood is atso greater near Randlett than at <br />300o C~ ?~-oo ck-i <br />Myton. The 2-yr recurrence flood is about 85 m'/s at Myton and is 105 m'/s near <br />Randlett for the period 1943 to 1994 (Fig. 4). However, flood magnitudes were greater <br />earlier in the twentieth century, and the magnitude of floods is slightly larger for the <br />entire period of record at Myton. The time series record of annual floods (Fig. 3B) <br />shows that the periods of high annual runoff and large floods are the same. Large floods <br />near Randlett are typically much larger than at Myton, but small annual floods are <br />13 <br />