My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7072
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
7072
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:29 PM
Creation date
6/1/2009 11:30:45 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
7072
Author
Brewer, M. and J. Renne.
Title
Crystal Reservoir Temperature Study.
USFW Year
1988.
USFW - Doc Type
Lakewood, CO.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
~. <br />,' Crystal Reservoir Te~perature Study <br />Page 7 <br />Septe.ber 23, 1988 <br />in both the regression and transport models. However, validation of <br />the model suggests a high degree of reliability and indicates areas <br />within the network to look for improvement; one such area is the <br />validation node on the Gunnison River Below the Gunnison Tunnel. <br />Finally, validation indicates the Temperature Model can be used as a <br />tool for evaluating instream temperatures as a function of water <br />management. <br />An appendix including all model input files and output tables is <br />available from the Regional Hydrologist, Region Six, Lakewood, <br />Colorado. <br />Recommendations <br />The following recommendations should be completed to improve model <br />prediction: <br />• Investigate water temperature as a function of flow at the <br />Gunnison Gage below the Gunnison Diversion. Improve the <br />existing database, if possible. <br />.' • Collect additional water temperature data immediately below <br />Crystal-Dam to develop an improved regression model of <br />temperature versus flow and climatic conditions. <br />• Compare observed temperatures collected at PHABSIM sites to <br />predicted temperatures. <br />• Determine if the bi-weekly time period used is necessary for <br />project impact assessment by fishery biologists. Can we go <br />back to a monthly time step? <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.