Laserfiche WebLink
<br />- <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />- <br /> <br />3 <br />incrementing the beginning and ending years of the natural flows for the following input trace by <br />one year. For example, the fIrst trace of the model began with the natural flows for January 1921, <br />and ended 39 years later with the natural flows for December 1959. The second trace began <br />with natural flows for January 1922 and ended in December 1960. Subsequent traces were <br />developed in this manner until the end of the period of record was reached (December 1985). <br />Once the end of the period of record was reached, additional traces were created by incrementally <br />appending the initial natural flows from the period of record to the end of the trace so that the <br />length ofthe trace was 39 years long. For example, the 28th trace contained the natural flows for <br />January 1948 through December 1985. But this only equaled 38 years. To extend this trace to a <br />length of39 years, the natural flows for January 1921 through December 1921 were added to the <br />end of the 28th trace. The 29th trace required that 2 years of natural flows (January 1921 through <br />December 1922) be appended to the end of the trace to achieve a length of39 years. This <br />process was continued until all 65 traces were constructed. When the Green River model is run, <br />the model run is complete when all 65 input traces have been successfully routed through the <br />Green River system. <br /> <br />To evaluate how well each run ofthe model achieved the flow objectives of the <br />proposed alternatives, it was necessary to generate output at a daily time step for river flows in <br />Reaches One and Two. A daily post processor model was constructed for this purpose. The <br />daily post processor model generated the spring release hydro graph from the monthly model <br />results and processed it into daily results. The daily release hydrograph was then routed through <br />Reaches One and Two of the Green River. The historic daily flows of the Yampa River for the <br />period from January 1, 1921, to December 31, 1985, were taken from United States Geological <br />Survey stream flow records and were used as the input hydrology by the daily post processor. <br />There are no rules in the daily post processor that operate Flaming Gorge Dam that are unique to <br />the daily postprocessor model. All of the rules necessary to operate Flaming Gorge Dam to <br />achieve the proposed alternatives are present in the monthly model and the daily post processor <br />model. <br /> <br />Ruleset Development <br /> <br />The rules that operate Flaming Gorge Dam to achieve the objectives of the proposed <br />alternatives are referred to as rulesets. For each of the proposed alternatives, one ruleset has been <br />developed. The paragraphs below describe the specifIc objectives that each ruleset was designed <br />to achieve. <br /> <br />During the spring (April through July), the objectives ofthe Action Alternative require a <br />peak release magnitude of suffIcient duration to achieve flow targets in Reaches One and Two. <br />These objectives change depending on the hydrologic condition of the Upper Green River Basin. <br />Except for cases when the minimum release rate of 800 cfs is prescribed, the objectives for <br />Reach Two appear to achieve the objectives for Reach One as well. The spring objectives of the <br />Action Alternative for Reach Two that are achieved by the Action ruleset are described below. <br />