Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />- <br /> <br /> <br />20 <br />arison of Action (ALL and ALL-l Reach Two <br /> <br />30000 <br /> <br />25000 <br /> <br />20000 <br /> <br />-- <br />~ <br />';: 15000 <br />o <br />[;:; <br /> <br />10000 <br /> <br />Example Flow Hydrograph - Reach 2 <br />Historical Year 1970, Trace 37, Year 2015 <br /> <br />No Action <br />Historical (1970) <br />All - 1 <br />All <br /> <br />5000 <br /> <br /> <br />o <br />May-O 1 <br /> <br />JlIn-OI <br /> <br />Ju1-01 <br /> <br />AlIg-O I <br /> <br />Dale <br /> <br />Figures 16 and 17 show how the duration of the release peak was affected by the <br />Action(ALL and ALL-I) and No Action rulesets. The distribution of Reach One flows that were <br />exceeded for a duration of two weeks is presented in Figure 16 while Figure 17 shows the <br />distribution of Reach One flows that were exceeded for four weeks. Distributions for all three <br />model runs are presented while the historic values that occurred during the period from 1971 to <br />1991 are also presented in these figures. <br />