Laserfiche WebLink
Whirling Disease-Positive Fish Production Facilities <br />From 1988 until the passage of Senate Bill 90-67 in 1990, anyone who had a commercial <br />lake license could sell and transport live fish and was therefore considered a fish hatchery. A <br />commercial lake license holder was immediately quarantined if they became positive for WD. <br />Senate Bill 90-67 separated a commercial lake license from an aquaculture license (fish hatchery). <br />A commercial lake license permittee could no longer sell or transport live fish and, consequently, <br />did not pose a threat of spreading the disease. After 1990 (creation of the aquaculture license), <br />the number of permitted people selling and transporting live fish dropped from approximately 140 <br />to 37. As a result, the number of WD-quarantined facilities dropped dramatically. Today there <br />are five private hatcheries, one non-profit club, eight state hatcheries (Mt. Ouray became negative <br />in June 1996), and one federal hatchery considered positive for WD (Appendix Q. <br />Costs <br />Beginning in 1988, the DOW fish health program expanded rapidly. Much of this expansion <br />can be attributed to the WD issue. Before 1988, the DOW had one fish pathologist working in <br />office space donated by the USFWS at the Fish Health Laboratory in Ft. Morgan, Colorado. In <br />1988, noted previously, the DOW leased space for its own WD laboratory and hired two <br />temporary employees. In February 1989, the DOW put together a Colorado Aquaculture <br />Advisory Committee composed of three members from the private aquaculture community, one <br />employee from the USFWS, and two representatives from the DOW. After several meetings, the <br />committee produced a final report that dealt with fish health regulations, legislation, compliance, <br />indemnification, inspection costs, and future committees. The Director agreed with the <br />recommendations and signed the document on October 13, 1989. For the first time in the history <br />of the DOW, the Fish Health Section had an opportunity to become proactive rather than reactive <br />to fish health issues. As a result of this committee's efforts, and with support from the private <br />aquaculture sector, Senate Bill 90-67, which provided personnel and funding for fish health <br />programs and stiff penalties for the illegal movement of fish, was passed into law in 1990. As a <br />result of this legislation, the DOW was able to hire two more full-time employees for the fish <br />health program. The bill also provided for yearly funding to rent laboratory space, carry out fish <br />health-related activities, and pay part of a compliance officer's wages. <br />In late 1993, biologists observed that the wild rainbow trout population in the upper <br />Colorado River had apparently suffered three successive years of recruitment failure. Studies <br />conducted on the Colorado River during 1994 implicated WD as a significant factor and perhaps <br />the decisive factor in the loss of these year classes (Walker and Nehring 1995; Nehring and <br />Walker 1996). Additional studies throughout the summer and fall of 1994 and 1995 implicated <br />WD in similar year-class failures among wild rainbow trout populations in the Cache la Poudre, <br />Gunnison, Rio Grande, and South Platte rivers (Nehring 1996). <br />To deal with this situation, a major redirection of staff time and monetary resources within <br />the DOW began in 1994. Early in 1995, efforts at the Fish Health Lab were expanded with the <br />7