My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9588
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
9588
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:36 PM
Creation date
5/24/2009 7:32:34 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
9588
Author
Bestgen, K. R. and e. al.
Title
Population Status of Colorado Pikeminnow in the Green River Basin, Utah and Colorado.
USFW Year
2005.
USFW - Doc Type
Fort Collins, CO.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
114
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Other evidence and analyses also supported the notion of an apparently declining <br />population of Colorado pikeminnow in the Green River Basin during the study period. Estimates <br />of X greater than I for most years from 1991 to 2000 suggested an increasing population of <br />Colorado pikeminnow in the Green River Basin. After 2000, 1 was consistently much less than <br />1, which suggested a declining population. The negative rate of population change could be the <br />result of reduced survival or recruitment of Colorado pikeminnow, or some combination of all <br />those factors. <br />Trends in the ISMP catch/effort data were consistent with I and abundance estimates and <br />suggested a post year-2000 decline in abundance of Colorado pikeminnow in every portion of the <br />Green River Basin. If catch/effort indices reflected abundance, the Green River Colorado <br />pikeminnow population may be reduced to levels at or near those present in 1991. Catch/effort <br />data for Colorado pikeminnow for individual rivers showed a positive and reasonably strong <br />relationship with abundance estimates for middle and lower Green river reaches, and moderately <br />strong relationships in the White and Yampa rivers. Osmundson (2002) found poor agreement <br />with abundance estimates and catch/effort indices in the Colorado River, perhaps because of <br />relatively poor precision of abundance estimates. Investigation of the strength of these <br />relationships, and factors that affect those relationships, should continue in the future when more <br />abundance estimates are gathered, because ISMP-like sampling may yet be a useful, less- <br />intensive monitoring tool in the future. <br />Consistency of trends indicated by the less sampling intensive catch/effort and X <br />parameters compared to higher effort abundance estimation sampling suggested less costly <br />options to monitor some demographic parameters for Colorado pikeminnow in the Green River <br />Basin. Recall that data to estimate the I parameters for the years 1991 to 1999 were derived <br />45
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.