My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9588
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
9588
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:36 PM
Creation date
5/24/2009 7:32:34 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
9588
Author
Bestgen, K. R. and e. al.
Title
Population Status of Colorado Pikeminnow in the Green River Basin, Utah and Colorado.
USFW Year
2005.
USFW - Doc Type
Fort Collins, CO.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
114
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
raft-based (White River and Desolation-Gray Canyon Green River reaches) electrofishing as the <br />standard technique, sampling during each occasion began at the top of each reach and proceeded <br />downstream. Electrofishing units were either pulsed-DC Coffelt or Smith-Root types, with one <br />or two anode booms with spheres. Two boats were typically used on each sampling occasion, <br />one on each shore, and one or usually two netters captured stunned Colorado pikeminnow. All <br />nearshore habitat that was likely to hold Colorado pikeminnow was electrofished. <br />Approximately 7 to 10 d elapsed between short-term sampling occasions in each reach <br />and year to allow for sufficient mixing of marked and unmarked fish. In the Yampa River in <br />2000, only a single electrofishing boat was used, but that effort was supplemented with passive <br />sampling gears such as fyke nets and trammel nets in low velocity areas. A block-and-shock <br />technique was sometimes used, where a large, nearshore, quiet-water area was isolated from the <br />main channel with a trammel net and electrofishing commenced inside the block net. Colorado <br />pikeminnow were captured by netters or in trammel nets as they attempted to leave the backwater <br />for the main channel. Use of these techniques was limited in other years and reaches. <br />In most reaches, sampling focused only on Colorado pikeminnow, although other <br />endangered fishes, and non-native northern pike, were sometimes captured. Colorado <br />pikeminnow were measured (TL, nearest mm), weighed (nearest g), scanned for the presence of a <br />PIT tag, and unmarked fish (>150 mm) received a PIT tag inserted into the body cavity just <br />posterior to the pelvic girdle. The initial capture and release location (nearest 0.1 RK) was <br />determined from river maps and a Global Positioning System unit and all Colorado pikeminnow <br />were released within 0.15 km of their capture location. <br />Additional data utilized in this study was from an Interagency Standardized Monitoring <br />Program (ISMP, McAda 2002). The ISMP sampled adult and sub-adult Colorado pikeminnow <br />18
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.