Laserfiche WebLink
suitably diverse habitat occurred, all three species <br />might be found together. <br />The optimum habitat of bonytail chubs, based on <br />former collections when they were abundant, appears <br />to be the open river areas of relatively uniform <br />depth and current velocity. This type of habitat <br />typically consists of a shifting sand bottom water <br />depths of 3 to 4 feet, and a relatively constant, <br />moderately swift current. The streamlined body and <br />large fins of the bonytail chub seem to make it well <br />adapted to live in this type of habitat. <br />The bonytail chub is a relatively long-lived <br />species. It does not spawn until it reaches an age <br />of 5 to 7 years; like the other chub species, it <br />spawns when the water reaches about 650 F. Little is <br />known about the life history of the bonytail chub be- <br />cause it rapidly disappeared before intensive studies <br />were made. It feeds on insects, often terrestrial <br />insects taken on the surface of the water. Fragments <br />of debris and algae in the stomachs of the relatively <br />few specimens examined suggest that the bonytail chub <br />may feed intensively after a sudden storm cause flood- <br />waters to wash food out of tributaries into the main <br />river channels. The maximum size attained by the <br />bonytail chub is, in general, 16 to 18 inches. How- <br />ever, small numbers have continued to exist in the <br />lower basin reservoirs, Lake Mohave and Lake Havasu, <br />where they may attain a large size. A specimen about <br />3 feet long and weighing 8 pounds was reported caught <br />by an angler in 1975 from Lake Mohave. <br />Present and Past Distribution <br />The original distribution included the large- <br />river environments of the entire basin from Mexico to <br />Wyoming. In the Gila River, Arizona, bonytail chubs <br />were last recorded in 1926. They declined in the <br />lower basin after the construction of lakes Mead, <br />Havasu, and Mohave. Although they persisted in large <br />numbers in these reservoirs for several years, and <br />large numbers were observed spawning in Lake Mohave <br />in 1954, their numbers continued to decline, because <br />its spawning did not result in the survival of young <br />fish. The bonytail chub was still abundant in the <br />Green River until after the completion of Flaming <br />Gorge Reservoir in 1963. By the late 1960's bonytail <br />chubs became very rare. Except for the few specimens <br />that may yet persist in lakes Havasu and Mohave, the <br />only bonytail chubs reported in the last 3 years were <br />from the Green River in Utah. If. it were not for the <br />stark example provided by the passenger pigeon, such <br />rapid disappearance of a species once so abundant <br />would be almost beyond belief. <br />Causes of Decline <br />The lack of successful reproduction in reser- <br />voirs explains the disappearance of bonytail chubs <br />from the segments of their former range that were <br />converted into impoundments. Their absence from the <br />Colorado River of Colorado and Utah and from most of <br />the Green River where apparently suitable habitat <br />still exists is not so easily explained. There is <br />little in the way of documented evidence about the <br />occurrence or abundance of bonytail chubs in the <br />Colorado River in Colorado and Utah, but it is as- <br />sumed that they were common in this large-river <br />environment. The open river or "run" type of habitat <br />does not seem to be extensively used by non-native <br />fishes. Thus, the "bonytail niche" would be expected <br />to be less impaired than the niches of some other <br />native fishes. Yet, the bonytail chub has suffered <br />greater declines than any other native species and <br />is now the rarest member of the original fish fauna. <br />Controlled water releases from Flaming Gorge <br />Dam eliminated the great seasonal peaks of high and <br />low flows of the original Green River and also cause <br />daily fluctuations due to power generation. These <br />changes in flow undoubtedly have influenced subtle <br />changes in channel configuration and altered optimum <br />bonytail chub habitat. Although there are no large <br />dams on the Colorado River above Lake Powell (except <br />in the headwaters), tributary reservoirs such as the <br />Curecanti Project on the Gunnison, Ruedi Reservoir on <br />the Frying Pan River, and Dillon and Green Mountain <br />reservoirs on the Blue River alter the historical <br />flow regime in the Colorado by reducing the peak <br />spring flows. Large amounts of water are diverted <br />for irrigation, and the return flows are diminished <br />and the water quality altered. <br />The extent of the quantitative and qualitative <br />changes in the flows of the upper Colorado River <br />basin can be understood from the following facts and <br />figures. The annual average virgin flow of the upper <br />Colorado River basin at Lee's Ferry was 14,900,000 <br />acre feet of water. By 1975, 3,823,900 acre feet of <br />water (26% of the average virgin flow) were lost to <br />the basin by consumptive irrigation use, transmountain <br />diversions out of the basin, reservoir evaporation, <br />and by cities and industry. Due to reservoir <br />storage, the peak flushing flows of May and June are <br />now at all time low discharge levels in the Green and <br />20