Laserfiche WebLink
iv <br />8-13. Graphs showing: <br />8. (A) Specific conductance and dissolved (B) calcium, Q magnesium, (D) chloride, <br />and (E) sulfate concentrations overtime forwell 7 in the Fraser River watershed, <br />1998-2001 ............................................................................... 19 <br />9. Dissolved sulfate and chloride concentrations and discharge atthe Fraser River <br />below Crooked Creek at Tabernash, Colorado, 1998-2001 ................................ 21 <br />10. Dissolved ammonia and nitrate concentrations and discharge atthe <br />Fraser River below Crooked Creek atTabernash, Colorado, 1998-2001 .................. 22 <br />11. Phosphorus concentrations and discharge atthe Fraser River below <br />Crooked Creek at Tabernash, Colorado, 1998-2001 ...................................... 23 <br />12. Organic carbon concentrations and discharge atthe Fraser River below <br />Crooked Creek atTabernash, Colorado, 1998-2001 ....................................... 24 <br />13. Fecal coliform bacteria concentrations and discharge atthe Fraser River below <br />Crooked Creek atTabernash, Colorado, 1998-2001 ....................................... 24 <br />14. Map showing extent and depth of the alluvial aquifer in the upper Fraser River <br />watershed .................................................................................... 26 <br />15. Graph showing ground-water level and temperature in the alluvial aquifer (site 9) in the <br />upper Fraser River watershed, 1998-2001 ...................................................... 27 <br />Tables <br />1. Description of 11 ground-water wells and one surface-water sampling site in the Fraser <br />River watershed, August 1998-September 2001 ...................................................6 <br />2. Statistical summary of selected ground-water data forthe Fraser Riverwatershed, <br />1998-2001, with U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and State of Colorado <br />water-quality standards and U.S. Geological Survey National Water Quality <br />Laboratory reporting levels ...................................................................... 10 <br />3. Results of two-tailed Wilcoxon rank-sum tests for comparison of selected field properties <br />and water-quality constituents in wells by aquifer type, land use, and individual septic <br />disposal system (ISDS) or non-ISDS area, Fraser River watershed, 1998-2001 .................... 12 <br />4. Statistical summary of selected field properties and water-quality constituents for surface <br />water atthe Fraser River below Crooked Creek atTabernash, Colorado, 1998-2001 .............. 20 <br />APPENDIX I and II TABLES <br />5. Selected ground-water-quality data for wells in the Fraser River watershed, 1998-2001.......... 35 <br />6. Comparison of laboratory results for environmental and quality-control samples for 9wells <br />in the Fraser River watershed, 1998-2001 ........................................................ 49 <br />7. Summary of differences between environmental and quality-control samples for wells in <br />the Fraser River watershed, 1998-2001 ........................................................... 55 <br />8. Variability and uncertainty in manganese, ammonia, nitrate, and radon-222 concentrations <br />as determined by replicate pairs for wells in the Fraser River watershed, 1998-2001 .............. 56 <br />9. Concentrations of major ions, trace elements, nutrients, and dissolved organic carbon in <br />blank samples for wells in the Fraser River watershed, 1998-2001 ............................... 56