Laserfiche WebLink
4 Streamwater Quality at Selected Sites in the Fraser River Basin, Grand County, Colorado, Water Years 1991-2000 <br />Table 3. Summary of median concentrations of selected water-quality constituents at 13 sites in the Fraser River Basin, 1991-2000. <br />[mg/L, milligrams per liter] <br />Site Site Chloride Ammonia Nitrite Dissolved Ortho- Total <br />number name (mg/L) (mg/L) plus nitrate phosphorus phosphorus phosphorus <br />(fig. 1) (mg/L) (mg/L) (mg/L) (mg/L) <br />1 Fraser River at Upper Station, near 9.782 0.002 0.084 0.003 0.001 0.050 <br /> Winter Park, CO <br />2 Fraser River below Buck Creek at 8.370 0.003 0.075 0.004 0.002 0.050 <br /> Winter Park, CO <br />3 Fraser River below Vasquez Creek 5.40 0.018 0.127 0.012 0.009 0.050 <br /> at Winter Park, CO <br />4 Fraser River at Tabernash, CO 4.835 0.065 0.169 0.062 0.051 0.102 <br />5 Fraser River below Crooked Creek 3.48 0.034 0.085 0.031 0.027 0.059 <br /> at Tabernash, CO <br />6 Fraser River at Highway 40 at 4.010 0.030 0.140 0.040 0.040 0.060 <br /> Granby, CO <br />7 Crooked Creek below Tipperary Creek 0.280 0.004 0.006 0.007 0.005 0.041 <br /> near Tabernash, CO <br />8 Crooked Creek above Pole Creek at 2.915 0.007 0.005 0.015 0.010 0.041 <br /> Tabemash, CO <br />9 Pole Creek at Upper Station near 0.380 0.005 0.008 0.017 0.013 0.050 <br /> Tabernash, CO <br />10 Pole Creek at mouth near Tabernash, CO 2.04 0.008 0.025 0.021 0.017 0.051 <br />11 Ranch Creek near Fraser, CO 0.251 0.002 0.033 0.004 0.003 0.030 <br />12 Hurd Creek below Trail Creek near 0.405 0.004 0.005 0.004 0.002 0.050 <br /> Tabernash, CO <br />13 Ranch Creek below Meadow Creek 0.515 0.003 0.035 0.012 0.007 0.050 <br /> near Tabernash, CO <br />Water samples were analyzed for dissolved chloride, dis- <br />solved or total ammonia, dissolved or total nitrite plus nitrate, <br />dissolved and total phosphorus, dissolved orthophosphorus, <br />and fecal coliform bacteria. Properties measured at the time <br />of sample collection include water temperature, pH, specific <br />conductance, and dissolved oxygen. The dissolved phase of <br />water-quality constituents was obtained by filtering sampled <br />water through a 0.45-µm (micrometer) filter; total concentra- <br />tions are from unfiltered samples. Nutrient samples (ammonia, <br />nitrite plus nitrate, phosphorus, and orthophosphorus) col- <br />lected in the Fraser River Basin from October 1991 through <br />September 2000 were analyzed for either total or dissolved <br />concentrations. In general, most samples collected before cal- <br />endar year 1992 were analyzed for total nutrients. From water <br />year 1993 through 2000, water-quality samples were analyzed <br />for dissolved nutrients. Total and dissolved concentrations <br />only were determined for phosphorus from samples collected <br />for the same sampling event. At sites where total and dissolved <br />nutrient samples were collected over time, the data were <br />aggregated for statistical analysis using the methods outlined <br />in Mueller and others (1995). Unless otherwise specified, con- <br />centrations in this report represent aggregated concentrations. <br />Streamwater-Quality Results <br />Stream Standards <br />Specific properties and constituents compared to appli- <br />cable State standards include pH, dissolved oxygen, fecal <br />coliform bacteria, un-ionized ammonia, nitrite plus nitrate, and <br />chloride. A summary of water-quality data for selected con- <br />stituents is in tables 2 and 3. Analysis of the data for this report <br />indicates that water quality in the Fraser River Basin is gener- <br />ally very good and compares favorably to State standards. <br />In general, pH measurements from the study sites were <br />within the State standard range of 6.5-9. At site 4, the pH <br />measurements were greater than the maximum State standard <br />for less than 10 percent (29) of the total number (307) of mea- <br />surements taken. Compliance with State standards, however, <br />is determined by comparing the 15th and 85th percentiles <br />of the representative water-quality data with the associated <br />water-quality standard. For site 4, the 15th and 85th percentile <br />values for pH were equal to 7.6 and 8.8, respectively, which is