Laserfiche WebLink
access by smaller fish. We constructed each cage of four panels that were 1.2 in high and two <br />meters wide. The panels were framed with wood and covered with 1.6 mm fiberglass screen. <br />The four panels were bolted together and the cage was placed in the backwater and secured <br />with fence posts placed at each corner. The cages extended 20 to 40 cm above the water <br />surface, varying, over time, with river depth. The position of the treatments within each <br />backwater was randomized. <br />The third treatment allowed us to: (1) determine the combined effect of the smaller fish <br />(i.e. red shiner, young Colorado squawfish, etc.) on the backwater invertebrate community, <br />and (2) to check for cage effect (whether any statistical significant differences between the <br />control treatment and the closed treatment were due to the presence or absence of fish, or to <br />some physical differences created by the cage). <br />Sampling_ <br />Enclosures were installed August 6-8, 1992. Samples were initially taken weekly; <br />August 14-15 (week 1), August 21-22 (week 2), August 28-29 (week 3). After week 3 the <br />sampling interval was lengthened to approximately biweekly because of decreasing water <br />temperatures; September 11-12 (week 5), September 25-26 (week 7), and October 16-17 (week <br />10) (Shiozawa and Barnes 1977). During each sampling period 30 benthic cores (19 mm in <br />diameter) and five vertical plankton tows (20 cm in diameter) were taken from each treatment <br />within each backwater. While the total number of core samples taken per treatment was high <br />(180), the total area sampled over the duration of the experiment was approximately 510 <br />square centimeters. This surface area was low enough that sample removal was unlikely to <br />significantly influence the treatments. Samples were preserved in a 5 % formalin solution. <br />3