My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9544
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
9544
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:36 PM
Creation date
5/24/2009 7:27:25 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
9544
Author
Collins, K., P. and D. K. Shiozawa.
Title
The Effects of Fish Predation on Backwater Invertebrate Communities of the Green River, Utah.
USFW Year
1994.
USFW - Doc Type
Provo, UT.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
26
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
and Rotifera were counted using a dissecting microscope. All benthic and planktonic <br />organisms from the three treatments were counted for weeks 1, 3, and 5. Benthic and <br />planktonic organisms from 10 randomly chosen benthic samples were analyzed from <br />weeks 2, 7, and 10. Chironomidae, Copepoda, and Cladocera were identified from at <br />least ten benthic samples from each of the sample series. Cladocerans and adult <br />copepods from all sorted plankton samples were identified. Chironomidae were <br />mounted on slides in Hoyer's solution and identified to genus using keys by Merritt and <br />Cummins (1984), Wiederholm (1983), and Mason (1968). Cladocerans and adult <br />copepods were identified to species using. a keys by Yeatman (1959), and Pennak <br />(1989). <br />Statistical analysis <br />Data from weeks 1, 3, and 5 were examined with analysis of variance (ANOVA) <br />tests. During week 7 we noted a significant reduction in permeability of the enclosure <br />cages caused by growth of algae on the screens. This introduced a potential bias <br />when comparing these areas with the open control sites for weeks 7 and 10 and for <br />that reason the closed and perforated treatments were excluded from the analysis. <br />We performed a weighted ANOVA on the treatment means (of sample counts) for <br />each group of organisms. The weighting was based on the number of samples <br />processed for the mean. The ANOVA model was: <br />Y;;k=N+B;+D;+BD;j+Tk+BT;k+DT,k+BDT;;k <br />where Y;jk is the count mean of the it' backwater on the jt' date from the kt' treatment, <br />B; is the backwater (block) effect, Dj is the date effect, and Tk is the treatment. F- <br />6
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.