Laserfiche WebLink
MANOVA test performed on trophic grouping was not significant, however the <br />univariate ANOVA performed on the benthic predators was significant (p = 0.007). <br />Plankton <br />Copepodite and naupliar copepods and rotifers were the most abundant <br />planktonic groups collected during the study period (Table 3). Numbers of planktonic <br />microcrustaceans were in the range previously reported by Mabey (1993). The same <br />four copepod species collected in the benthos also occured in the plankton. One <br />additional cladoceran species, Leydigia quadrangularis, was discovered in the <br />plankton, but only three specimens were collected. Corixidae of the genus Tricorixa, <br />which were almost non-existent in benthic samples, were common in the plankton. <br />Weighted ANOVA tests indicated that all adult copepods, EuQyclops speratus <br />(Copepoda), and corixids were significantly higher (a = 0.05) in the closed treatments <br />than in control areas (Table 4). As in-the benthos, the MANOVA test performed on <br />the trophic grouping was not significant, however the univariate ANOVA performed on <br />benthic predators was significant (p = 0.021). <br />In the perforated treatment the densities of invertebrate groups that showed a <br />significant treatment affect were generally intermediate between the control and closed <br />treatments indicating that they truly represented an intermediate level of predation. <br />The levels of chlorophyll a showed no effect of the treatments, suggesting that <br />phytoplankton densities were unchanged. We found consistently lower chironomid <br />diversity in the closed treatments (Table 5). Copepods, however, showed no <br />consistent change on diversity among the treatments. <br />9